All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flower... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?
  • a)
    3, 8, 24
  • b)
    7, 9, 17
  • c)
    6, 9, 12
  • d)
    5, 15, 18
  • e)
    9, 10, 13
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers ...
The correct response is (E). It is easier to use process of elimination on this type of question. Since all of the answer choices have at least one single-digit number in it, let’s look at the second requirement. If only one of the numbers was divisible by 3, we can eliminate answer choices that contain more than one multiple of 3: (A), (C), and (D).
The third requirement is that we have at least one even number. Between (B) and (E), only choice (E) contains an even number, 10.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers ...
The correct response is (E). It is easier to use process of elimination on this type of question. Since all of the answer choices have at least one single-digit number in it, let’s look at the second requirement. If only one of the numbers was divisible by 3, we can eliminate answer choices that contain more than one multiple of 3: (A), (C), and (D).
The third requirement is that we have at least one even number. Between (B) and (E), only choice (E) contains an even number, 10.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a “leveraged buyout” became popular as a method for companies to expand without having to spend any of their own assets. The leveraged buyout was not without its problems, however, and in time it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed. Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.A leveraged buyout entails one company purchasing another using the assets of the purchased company as the collateral to secure the funds needed to buy that company. The leveraged buyout allows companies to take on debt that their own assets would have been insufficient to secure in order to finance expansion. The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious: companies with insufficient funds can still expand to compete with larger competitors. The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact: the purchased company must perform extraordinarily well in order to generate the capital to pay off the loans that made the purchase possible in the first place. When the purchased company underperforms, the buyer must somehow find the money to pay off the loans. If such funds are not obtained, the buyer may be forced to sell off the company, or parts thereof, for less than the purchase price. In these cases, the buyer is still responsible for repaying the debt that is not covered by the sale price. Many of these deals resulted in the evisceration of the purchased companies, as subparts were sold to pay down the loans and employees were laid off to reduce costs and increase profits.The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988 purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (“KKR”). The purchase price for the corporate giant RJR Nabisco was $25 billion, almost all of which was borrowed money. The takeover was “hostile,” meaning that RJR Nabisco resisted any overtures from potential buyers. KKR ultimately succeeded by buying a controlling interest in RJR Nabisco, thereby obtaining voting control over the company. By the mid-1990s, though, KKR had seen a reversal of fortune and was forced to sell off RJR Nabisco in order to relieve itself of the crushing debt load.The 1980s were the heyday of the leveraged buyout, as lending institutions were willing to loan money for these ventures. When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.Q.The author mentions the RJR Nabisco case most probably in order to emphasize which of the following points?

In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a “leveraged buyout” became popular as a method for companies to expand without having to spend any of their own assets. The leveraged buyout was not without its problems, however, and in time it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed. Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.A leveraged buyout entails one company purchasing another using the assets of the purchased company as the collateral to secure the funds needed to buy that company. The leveraged buyout allows companies to take on debt that their own assets would have been insufficient to secure in order to finance expansion. The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious: companies with insufficient funds can still expand to compete with larger competitors. The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact: the purchased company must perform extraordinarily well in order to generate the capital to pay off the loans that made the purchase possible in the first place. When the purchased company underperforms, the buyer must somehow find the money to pay off the loans. If such funds are not obtained, the buyer may be forced to sell off the company, or parts thereof, for less than the purchase price. In these cases, the buyer is still responsible for repaying the debt that is not covered by the sale price. Many of these deals resulted in the evisceration of the purchased companies, as subparts were sold to pay down the loans and employees were laid off to reduce costs and increase profits.The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988 purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (“KKR”). The purchase price for the corporate giant RJR Nabisco was $25 billion, almost all of which was borrowed money. The takeover was “hostile,” meaning that RJR Nabisco resisted any overtures from potential buyers. KKR ultimately succeeded by buying a controlling interest in RJR Nabisco, thereby obtaining voting control over the company. By the mid-1990s, though, KKR had seen a reversal of fortune and was forced to sell off RJR Nabisco in order to relieve itself of the crushing debt load.The 1980s were the heyday of the leveraged buyout, as lending institutions were willing to loan money for these ventures. When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.Q.The passage provides support for which of the following statements?

In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a “leveraged buyout” became popular as a method for companies to expand without having to spend any of their own assets. The leveraged buyout was not without its problems, however, and in time it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed. Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.A leveraged buyout entails one company purchasing another using the assets of the purchased company as the collateral to secure the funds needed to buy that company. The leveraged buyout allows companies to take on debt that their own assets would have been insufficient to secure in order to finance expansion. The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious: companies with insufficient funds can still expand to compete with larger competitors. The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact: the purchased company must perform extraordinarily well in order to generate the capital to pay off the loans that made the purchase possible in the first place. When the purchased company underperforms, the buyer must somehow find the money to pay off the loans. If such funds are not obtained, the buyer may be forced to sell off the company, or parts thereof, for less than the purchase price. In these cases, the buyer is still responsible for repaying the debt that is not covered by the sale price. Many of these deals resulted in the evisceration of the purchased companies, as subparts were sold to pay down the loans and employees were laid off to reduce costs and increase profits.The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988 purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (“KKR”). The purchase price for the corporate giant RJR Nabisco was $25 billion, almost all of which was borrowed money. The takeover was “hostile,” meaning that RJR Nabisco resisted any overtures from potential buyers. KKR ultimately succeeded by buying a controlling interest in RJR Nabisco, thereby obtaining voting control over the company. By the mid-1990s, though, KKR had seen a reversal of fortune and was forced to sell off RJR Nabisco in order to relieve itself of the crushing debt load.The 1980s were the heyday of the leveraged buyout, as lending institutions were willing to loan money for these ventures. When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.Q.The primary purpose of the passage is to

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Matthew, Jared, and Richard all bought flowers. The number of flowers Matthew purchased was equal to a single digit. Of the numbers of flowers purchased by Matthew, Jared, and Richard, only one was divisible by 3. The number of flowers one of them bought was an even number. Which of the following could represent the numbers of flowers each purchased?a)3, 8, 24b)7, 9, 17c)6, 9, 12d)5, 15, 18e)9, 10, 13Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup