Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Which one is not true about the Attorney Gen...

Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?

a)
He is the legal advisor to the Government of India
b)
His tenure and salary is decided by the President
c)
He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliament
d)
He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the...

Role of the Attorney General of India
The Attorney General of India is the chief legal advisor to the Government of India and plays a significant role in legal matters concerning the Union. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the responsibilities and limitations associated with this position:

Legal Advisor to the Government
- The Attorney General acts as the primary legal advisor to the Government of India, providing counsel on various legal issues.
- He represents the Union government in legal proceedings in the Supreme Court and High Courts.

Tenure and Salary
- The tenure and salary of the Attorney General are indeed determined by the President of India.
- There is no fixed term; the Attorney General serves at the pleasure of the President.

Voting Rights in Parliament
- The statement that the Attorney General has voting rights in Parliament is **not true**.
- The Attorney General is not a member of either house of Parliament and, therefore, does not possess voting rights.
- His role is limited to providing legal advice and representation in legal matters.

Representation in Courts
- The Attorney General appears before the Supreme Court and High Courts in cases involving the Union government.
- He represents the interests of the government and advocates on its behalf in legal matters.
In summary, while the Attorney General plays a crucial role in advising the government and representing it in legal matters, he does not have voting rights in Parliament. This distinction is essential to understanding his position and functions within the Indian legal framework.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

DU LLB Mock Test - 6 (New Pattern)
100 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the...

The Attorney General of India is the Indian government's chief legal advisor and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. They can be said to be the advocate from the government's side. They are appointed by the President of India on the advice of the Union Cabinet under Article 76 (1) of the Constitution and hold office during the pleasure of the President. They must be a person qualified to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court (They must have been a judge of some high court for five years or an advocate of some high court for ten years or an eminent jurist, in the opinion of the President and must be a citizen of India).

Hence, the correct option is (C).

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

President's rule has been imposed in Puducherry. President’s Rule was imposed in Puducherry following a recommendation by the Union Cabinet after a Congress-led government lost power in the Union Territory in a vote of confidence. The notification, signed by President Ram Nath Kovind, said the decision was taken after the president received a report from the administrator of the Union Territory of Puducherry on February 22.It said after considering the report and other information received by him, the president was satisfied that a situation had arisen in which the administration of the Union Territory of Puducherry could not carry on in accordance with the provisions of the [X]. The notification also said the Legislative Assembly of the Union Territory is placed under suspended animation.V Narayanasamy, who led the Congress government in Puducherry, resigned on Monday ahead of the confidence vote after his government was reduced to a minority following a spate of resignations by his party MLAs and a DMK legislator in recent days.The Ministry of Home Affairs on Thursday issued a notification of imposing President's rule in Puducherry after President Ram Nath Kovind was satisfied with the report of the Administrator of the Union Territory. Polls are due in the union territory soon and the BJP and its allies have not staked claim to form government.""I, Ram Nath Kovind, President of India, have received a report from the Administrator of the Union territory of Puducherry dated 22nd February 2021 and after considering the report and other information received by me, I am satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory of Puducherry cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the [X]."Q. Which of the following is NOT true with respect to President's Rule in India?

View answer

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following is not consistent with the passage?

View answer

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following is true regarding democracy according to the author?

View answer

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following is true with respect to the opposition? 1. The opposition has a united front 2. The opposition is scattered among themselves 3. The opposition proposed a joint session

View answer

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following would the author agree to?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which one is not true about the Attorney General of India?a)He is the legal advisor to the Government of Indiab)His tenure and salary is decided by the Presidentc)He has the voting right in the proceeding of the Parliamentd)He appears before high courts and Supreme Court in cases involving union government.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam