GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Directions: Each of these sentence correction...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.
Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.
- a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with
- b)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later in
- c)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later on
- d)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented in
- e)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented in
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions prese...
It is more idiomatic to say that the judges dissented in a case, or that the judges dissented from an opinion or interpretation than to say the judges dissented with a case.
The correct response is (E), “those” is the correct pronoun to refer back to “justices,” while “later dissented in another landmark case” correctly uses a past-tense verb.
If you chose (A), “half as many as later dissented” is not correct. This answer choice appears to be saying “two is half as many as later dissented” A better way of expressing this comparison is to say “two is half the number that later dissented”. Additionally, it is more idiomatic to say “the judges dissented in a landmark case” than to say “the judges dissented with a landmark case”. You can disagree with the verdict reached in a case, but you don’t disagree with the case itself.
If you chose (B), since “those” refers to people, the “justices,” we cannot use the pronoun “that.” Only “who” and “whom” can refer to people.
If you chose (C), the phrase “judgment of the defendant” here implies that the defendant was the one making the judgment, which is clearly false. In addition, the phrase “half the number as dissented later on” is needlessly wordy. Look for a more concise choice.
If you chose (D), “the ones” is an awkward choice of pronoun. Additionally, since the pronoun “which” refers to the immediately preceding noun (judgment), this answer choice appears to be saying “the judgment was half the ones who later dissented in…”
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions prese...
It is more idiomatic to say that the judges dissented in a case, or that the judges dissented from an opinion or interpretation than to say the judges dissented with a case.
The correct response is (E), “those” is the correct pronoun to refer back to “justices,” while “later dissented in another landmark case” correctly uses a past-tense verb.
If you chose (A), “half as many as later dissented” is not correct. This answer choice appears to be saying “two is half as many as later dissented” A better way of expressing this comparison is to say “two is half the number that later dissented”. Additionally, it is more idiomatic to say “the judges dissented in a landmark case” than to say “the judges dissented with a landmark case”. You can disagree with the verdict reached in a case, but you don’t disagree with the case itself.
If you chose (B), since “those” refers to people, the “justices,” we cannot use the pronoun “that.” Only “who” and “whom” can refer to people.
If you chose (C), the phrase “judgment of the defendant” here implies that the defendant was the one making the judgment, which is clearly false. In addition, the phrase “half the number as dissented later on” is needlessly wordy. Look for a more concise choice.
If you chose (D), “the ones” is an awkward choice of pronoun. Additionally, since the pronoun “which” refers to the immediately preceding noun (judgment), this answer choice appears to be saying “the judgment was half the ones who later dissented in…”
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: Each of these sentence correction practice questions presents a sentence, some or all of which is underlined. Below the sentence you will find five ways of phrasing the underlined part. Option A always repeats the original phrasing, while the other four are different. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence based on the requirements of standard written English. Your answer should make the sentence clear, exact, and grammatically correct.Q. During the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1857, Dred Scott v. Sandford, two justices opposed the judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented with another landmark case, 2000’s Bush v. Gore.a)judgment for the defendant, half as many as later dissented withb)defendant’s judgment, half those that gave their dissent later inc)judgment of the defendant, half the number as dissented later ond)defendant’s judgment, which was half the ones who later dissented ine)judgment for the defendant, half those who later dissented inCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup