Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Directions: Each of these critical reasoning ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.

Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.
Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.

a)
Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.
b)
Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.
c)
Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.
d)
The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.
e)
Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Classic Mock Test - 6

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are ba...

Strengthening the Argument for New Legislation to Regulate Wild-Animal Meat

Introduction:
The argument states that pollution levels in natural habitats have reached dangerous levels, resulting in contamination of wild game animals. To address this issue, the argument suggests the need for new legislation to regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat. To strengthen this argument, we need to find an option that provides additional support or evidence for the proposed legislation.

Option C: Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.

Explanation:
This option strengthens the argument by highlighting the significance of wild-animal meat as a source of animal protein for many people. Let's break down the key points:

1. Purchased game meat: This refers to wild-animal meat that is bought from the market or other sources.

2. Primary source of animal protein: This means that for a significant number of people, wild-animal meat constitutes the main or most important source of animal protein in their diet.

Reasoning:
The strength of this option lies in the fact that if wild-animal meat is the primary source of animal protein for many people, then it becomes crucial to regulate its processing and distribution. The rise in pollution levels and contamination of wild game animals would directly impact the health and well-being of these individuals, as they heavily rely on this meat for their nutritional needs.

By implementing new legislation, the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat can be more closely monitored and controlled, thereby ensuring that the contamination levels are reduced and the health risks associated with consuming contaminated meat are minimized.

Conclusion:
Option C provides strong support for the argument by emphasizing the importance of regulating wild-animal meat due to its significance as the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people. This option strengthens the argument by highlighting the potential health risks associated with consuming contaminated meat and the need for new legislation to address this issue.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Free Test

FREE

GMAT Classic Mock Test - 6
76 Ques | 158 Min

Start Free Test

View all free GMAT tests

Community Answer

Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are ba...

The correct answer is (C). (C) strengthens the argument because it rules out a counter-argument. If few people depend upon purchasing game meat, then the regulations on the sale of game meat will only affect the food safety of a small population. However, if a larger population is affected by the safety of game meat, the argument for regulation is stronger.

Share via Whatsapp

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

View answer

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The passage states which one of the following about underground oil reservoirs?

View answer

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The author’s attitude regarding oil well drilling regulations can most accurately be described as

View answer

Record companies defend their substitution of laser-read compact discs (CD’s) for the much less expensive traditional long-playing vinyl records in their catalogs by claiming that the audio market is ruled by consumer demand for ever-improved sound reproduction rather than by record manufacturers’ profit-motivated marketing decisions. But this claim cannot be true, because if it were true, then digital audiotape, which produces even better sound than CD’s, would be commercially available from these same record companies, but it is not.Which of the following, if true, best explains how the record companies’ claim about the nature of the audio reproduction market could be true and digital audiotape nevertheless be unavailable for the commercial market?

View answer

It now seems clear that the significant role initially predicted for personal computers in the classroom has not become fact. One need only look to the dramatic decline in sales of computers for classroom use in the past year for proof that the fad has passed.Which one of the following arguments contains flawed reasoning parallel to that in the argument above?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Pollution levels in natural habitats have risen so much that many wild game animals have been dangerously contaminated. New legislation is needed to further regulate the processing and distribution of wild-animal meat.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens this argument?s.a)Habitat destruction presents a greater threat to wild game populations than does hunting.b)Game meat is lower in unhealthy hormones and antibiotics than meat from commercially raised animals.c)Purchased game meat is the primary source of animal protein for a significant number of people.d)The wild animal population has held fairly steady over the past decade.e)Drafting appropriate legislation would be a lengthy and expensive process.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam