All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  In an effort to curb drug abuse, the governme... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.
Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?
  • a)
    Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.
  • b)
    Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishment
  • c)
    Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market again
  • d)
    Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugs
  • e)
    Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the market
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict law...
Analyzing the Argument
The author believes that the government should prosecute drug users and not dealers in order to control drug abuse.
  • In order to evaluate the argument, the answer option has to evaluate this suggestion made by the author. So, the correct option would be one that determines one or all of the following
    • whether prosecuting drug users is possible
    • if possible, then will such a measure be as or more effective than prosecuting drug dealers
    • whether for some reason, the current steps taken by the government are effective in tackling drug abuse.
Process of Elimination
  • Option (A) can be eliminated because what worked in other countries need not necessarily work in this one. The answer option has to evaluate whether the recommendation would work in this particular scenario.
  • Option (B) can be eliminated because if the payoffs are outweighing the punishment, that would mean that there would be more dealers involved in drug dealing. The argument implies that this will already happen so this option does nothing to evaluate the author’s recommendation.
  • Option (C) does not evaluate whether drug abuse would reduce or increase. What needs to be evaluated is drug usage and not drug dealing. For similar reasons, Option (E) can also be eliminated. Keeping track of new dealers does not necessarily keep track of drug dealing or usage.
  • Option (D) evaluates the argument because the author’s primary argument against the government’s actions is that the current efforts will not curb drug usage, and that sale of drugs will continue happening at a premium. However, if most drug users do not wish to pay the premium charged, then the sale and usage of drugs will come down and the government’s current measures will prove to be effective enough.
Choice D is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict law...
Analyzing the Argument
The author believes that the government should prosecute drug users and not dealers in order to control drug abuse.
  • In order to evaluate the argument, the answer option has to evaluate this suggestion made by the author. So, the correct option would be one that determines one or all of the following
    • whether prosecuting drug users is possible
    • if possible, then will such a measure be as or more effective than prosecuting drug dealers
    • whether for some reason, the current steps taken by the government are effective in tackling drug abuse.
Process of Elimination
  • Option (A) can be eliminated because what worked in other countries need not necessarily work in this one. The answer option has to evaluate whether the recommendation would work in this particular scenario.
  • Option (B) can be eliminated because if the payoffs are outweighing the punishment, that would mean that there would be more dealers involved in drug dealing. The argument implies that this will already happen so this option does nothing to evaluate the author’s recommendation.
  • Option (C) does not evaluate whether drug abuse would reduce or increase. What needs to be evaluated is drug usage and not drug dealing. For similar reasons, Option (E) can also be eliminated. Keeping track of new dealers does not necessarily keep track of drug dealing or usage.
  • Option (D) evaluates the argument because the author’s primary argument against the government’s actions is that the current efforts will not curb drug usage, and that sale of drugs will continue happening at a premium. However, if most drug users do not wish to pay the premium charged, then the sale and usage of drugs will come down and the government’s current measures will prove to be effective enough.
Choice D is the correct answer.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Read the passage and answer the question given below.American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis-à-vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the study’s sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the study’s implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Q. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis--vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the studys sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the studys implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Each of the following can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT

American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis--vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the studys sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the studys implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Which of the following most aptly describes the function of the second paragraph?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.Q. Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?a)Whether efforts have been successfully taken in any other country to regulate drug users.b)Whether the payoff from selling drugs outweighs the severity of the punishmentc)Whether drugs will continue to be sold at a premium when there are dealers in the market againd)Whether the majority of the users will be willing to pay a premium to continue to use the drugse)Whether the government will be able to keep track of new dealers as and when they enter the marketCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup