All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: Read the following passage and a... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.
Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.
Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.
Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.
In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.
  • a)
    Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.
  • b)
    Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.
  • c)
    Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.
  • d)
    Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The wo...
Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought Siya home.
Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.
In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Mira is married to Ravi and they have a five year old daughter, Kira. Kira is believed to be an illegitimate child of Mira and Rakesh. Mira doesn't let Rakesh to meet his daughter in fear that Ravi would come to know about Kira's real father. One day while Kira's way back to home from school, Rakesh enticed Kira in good faith to a restaurant for lunch. After that, he took her for a movie. On the other hand, Ravi finding Kira missing after school filed a missing complaint. Police found Kira with Rakesh. Decide.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Veer, a police constable found Pooja on Mathura railway station. Pooja was kidnapped by a group of goons. She fled from the group of goons and approached Veer for help. Pooja informed Veer that goons still have her sister Priya with them. She requested Veer to help her. Veer promised Pooja that he would help her. He took Pooja to his home and asked her to stay there until he finds her sister. After a while Veer started to force Pooja to do the household chores. Decide.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Aman, without the knowledge of the guardian, takes away Bharti, a 16-year-old girl from her house upon her request. He resorted her after one week. Decide.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Sameer was on his journey by car from Amritsar to Agra. Richa met him on the way and requested for a lift upto Delhi, an intermediate city. Sameer agreed to her request, but on reaching Delhi, he did not drop Richa there inspite of her repeated requests. Richa was carried over to Agra against her wishes. Here

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, a Hindu is bound, during his or her lifetime, to maintain his or her illegitimate children. The obligation to maintain illegitimate children is now upon both, the father as well as the mother. Not only the illegitimate son but also an illegitimate daughter is entitled to be maintained by her father and mother.The right to be maintained, however, extends only up to the period of minority. An illegitimate child is not entitled to be maintained by his or her parents after attaining majority. Such a child will also not be entitled to be maintained if he or she has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion.Moreover, under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, an illegitimate son of a deceased Hindu, so long as he is a minor, and an illegitimate daughter of a deceased Hindu, so long as she remains unmarried, are entitled to be maintained by the heirs of the deceased out of the estate inherited by them or by the persons who take the estate of the deceased.Such a son or daughter, however, will not be entitled to maintenance under the said Act if he or she has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion. An illegitimate child who has ceased to be a Hindu can, however, apply for maintenance from his or her father under the Code of Criminal Procedure.The court has given some landmark judgments in the field of illegitimacy. Some of such decisions are :The Supreme Court of India in Revanasiddappa vs. Mallikarjun opined that: the constitutional values enshrined in the Preamble of our Constitution that focuses on the concept of equality of status and opportunity and also on individual dignity. The Court has to remember that relationship between the parents may not be sanctioned by law but the birth of a child in such a relationship has to be viewed independently of the relationship of the parents. A child born in such a relationship is innocent and is entitled to all the rights which are given to other children born in a valid marriage.The Indian Society is a metaphysical society and so, it is going through a transformation stage that consists of two broad categories of people with two distinct ideologies. One of the groups believes in the orthodox methods of Hindu religion where having an illegitimate child is taboo and being one is a bigger stigma.The other group in the society consists of people who are rational and liberal in their outlook and do not consider illegitimacy as a stigma. They do not blame an illegitimate child for his/her existence instead blame the irresponsible couple. The laws in the society are also being amended accordingly as time and the situation demands.There is a need to be more liberal towards illegitimate children and the laws should also be amended in such a way that they have the best interest of all the people at heart.Q. Chandu is another illegitimate son of Manoj who is of 18.5 years now. Is he entitled to maintenance out of Manoj's estate?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The word "kidnapping" has been derived from the word 'kid' meaning child and 'napping' to steal. Thus, the word literally means "child stealing". Kidnapping under the code is not confined to child stealing. It has been given wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his/her consent, or the consent of some person legally authorised to accord consent on behalf of such person.Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Section 360 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from India. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India.Section 361 of the Indian Penal Code deals with kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age of a female, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship. This section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good faith believes himself to be entitled to the lawful custody of such child, unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.Abduction in common language means carrying away of a person by fraud or force. Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.In view of the definition, the word 'force' connotes actual force and not merely show or threat of force. Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from lawful guardianship, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.Q. Pawan and Siya, a married couple had a fight. In the heated argument, Pawan slapped Siya. Siya left the home in anger and shifted to her parental home. She filed a case for divorce. Pawan apologised to Siya and requested her to move back with him. Even after several tries Siya refused to move back. Pawan in aggression asked his sister to bring Siya home. Pawan's sister by physical force brought Siya back home. Decide.a)Pawan is guilty of abducting Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.b)Pawan is guilty of wrongfully restraining Siya as he forcefully kept her home.c)Pawan is guilty of kidnapping Siya as he forcefully brought her back home.d)Pawan's sister is guilty of abducting Siya as she forcefully brought siya home.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup