Question Description
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.a)(A) (II), (B) (I), (C) (IV), (D) (III)b)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (I), (D) (III)c)(A) (II), (B) (III), (C) (IV), (D) (I)d)(A) (II), (B) (IV), (C) (III), (D) (I)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.