Question Description
Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer accordingly.The Aravali hills have shaped the climate of the upper Indo-Gangetic plains for many hundreds of years. So, it's no surprise that their rapid man-made degradation in recent decades is proving very consequential, pushing the spread of the Indian desert towards eastern Rajasthan, Haryana and west Uttar Pradesh. Yet, despite numerous warning signs, governments have simply not stepped up to protect the Aravalis as they should. In 2018 the Supreme Court was informed that one-fourth of these hills in Rajasthan were gone forever. This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana.The Supreme Court took cognizance of yesterday's report to direct immediate stay on construction, asking the Haryana government to explain allowing such construction in violation of its orders. It appears court orders keep getting undermined just like government regulations - this may be the real contempt of court, rather than somebody's tweet - even as from the Himalayas to Western Ghats the local administration mindset is that if they aren't being used for mining or roads or to house people, the mountains are being wasted. In cases like Haryana the state itself can be seen resisting the notification of natural conservation zones, so much so that an exasperated Punjab and Haryana High Court said earlier this year, "If your intention is that you are not going to protect it.... then say so." It's against the backdrop of such challenges that the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2020 has been passionately debated.Q. "This newspaper has reported how after that too, the wrecking ball of construction has continued erasing hillocks in Haryana"- Which of the following statements weakens the argument given here?a)The newspaper has not reported anything about the erasing hill rocks in Haryana.b)Supreme Court has penalized the Haryana government for illegal constructionsc)Both (a) and (b)d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.