Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka an...

Join the Discussion on the App

Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkard's contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?

a)
10
b)
8
c)
5
d)
Data insufficient

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test Level 3: Quadratic Equations & Linear Equations

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it wit...

Let's solve the problem step by step.

Contributions of the drunkards:
- Let's assume the third drunkard contributed x liters of vodka.
- The second drunkard contributed 1 liter more than the third, so the second drunkard contributed (x + 1) liters of vodka.
- The first drunkard contributed 1 liter more than the second, so the first drunkard contributed (x + 1 + 1) liters of vodka.
- Therefore, the total amount of vodka contributed by all three drunkards is x + (x + 1) + (x + 1 + 1) = 3x + 3 liters.

Dividing the vodka:
- All four drunkards divided the vodka equally, so each drunkard received (3x + 3) / 4 liters of vodka.

Payment:
- The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkard's contribution towards his portion.
- Let's assume the second drunkard received y roubles.
- According to the given condition, the first drunkard received twice as much money as the second drunkard, so the first drunkard received 2y roubles.

Now, let's calculate the total amount of money paid by the fourth drunkard:
- The total amount of vodka received by the fourth drunkard is (3x + 3) / 4 liters.
- The price of 1 liter of vodka is 5 roubles, so the fourth drunkard paid (5 * (3x + 3)) / 4 roubles.

Dividing the payment:
- The first drunkard received 2y roubles, which is (2y / (2y + y)) * (5 * (3x + 3)) / 4 = (2/3) * (5/4) * (3x + 3) roubles.
- The second drunkard received y roubles, which is (y / (2y + y)) * (5 * (3x + 3)) / 4 = (1/3) * (5/4) * (3x + 3) roubles.

Given that the first drunkard received twice as much money as the second drunkard:
- (2/3) * (5/4) * (3x + 3) = 2 * (1/3) * (5/4) * (3x + 3)
- Canceling out common terms, we get:
- (2/3) = 2 * (1/3)
- 2/3 = 2/3

Therefore, the equation holds true for any value of y. This means that the amount of money received by the second drunkard (y) can be any value. The given information is not sufficient to determine the exact amount of money received by the second drunkard. Hence, the correct answer is option 'd' (Data insufficient).

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Attention CAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

The communities of ants are sometimes very large ,numbering even up to 500, individuals and it is a lesson to us that no one has ever yet seen quarrel between any two ants belonging to the same community .On the other hand ,it must be admitted that they are in hostility not only with most other insects ,including ants of different species ,but even with those of the same species if belongs to different communities .I have over and over again introduced ants from one of my nests into another nest of the same species ; and they were in variable attacked , seized by a leg or an antenna and dragged out .It is evident therefore ,that the ants of each community all recognize one another ,which is very remarkable .But more than this ,I several times divided a nest into two halves and found that even after separation of a year and nine months they recognize one another and were perfectly friendly ,while they at once attacked ants from a different nest ,although of the same species.It has been suggested that the ant of each nest have some sign or password by which they recognize one another .To test this I made some of them insensible, first I tried chloroform; but this was fatal to them and I do not consider the test satisfactory .I decided therefore to intoxicate them. This was less easy then I had expected .None of my ants would voluntarily degrade themselves by getting drunk .However ,I got over the difficulty by putting them into whisky for a few moments .I took fifty specimens –25 percent from one nest and 25 percent from another made them dead drunk ,marked each with a spot of paint ,and put them on a table close to where other ants from one of the nests were feeding .The table was surrounded as usual with a most of water to prevent them from straying .The ants ,which were feeding soon noticed those ,which I had made drunk .They seemed quite astonished to find their comrades in such a disgraceful condition ,and as much at loss to know what to do with their drunkards as we were .After a while ,however ,they carried them all away the strangers they took to the edge of the moat and dropped into the water ,while they bore their friends home in the nest where by degrees they slept off the effects of the spirits .Thus it is evident that they know their friends even when incapable of giving any sign or password.Q.Although the author is a scientist,his style of writing also exhibits a quality of

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Our meritocracy looks to markets to measure merit. Prices—including, crucially, wages—establish what things are worth. Greg Mankiw, who chaired George Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, captures the ideal in his “principle of just deserts.” Meritocracy holds that “a person who contributes more to society deserves a higher income that reflects those greater contributions.” Moreover, meritocracy measures each person’s contribution as the market value that she adds “to society’s production of goods and services.”But in reality, meritocratic hierarchies now distort market valuations, especially wages. Elites remake work in their own image, to privilege education and skills that only they can afford to acquire. Finance illustrates the pattern. In the mid 20th century, when the Economist called banking “the world’s most respectable dying industry,” those in the field were neither better educated nor better paid than others. Since then, super-educated elites have developed technologies—financial instruments, digital tools and legal regimes—that dramatically favour their own skills. Today, no sector is more closely associated with high wages. But the innovation is not a true advance, and the new style of finance does not make a greater social contribution than the old. The transaction costs of financial intermediation have not declined, and overall financial risk is neither reduced nor better shared.Similar patterns pervade the wider economy. Elites remake work to favour their peculiar skills and then use the enormous incomes that ensue to buy educations for their children that the rest cannot match. Far from correcting itself, meritocratic inequality triggers a feedback loop that undermines meritocracy’s core claims. Merit is an ideology built to launder offensive hierarchies.But,todays distribution of rewards and opportunities is notso repugnant that we need to junk the idea of merit.The meritocratic idea was forged in the revolt against the old society that fixed people’s position at birth, most notably in the French and American Revolutions of the 18th century and the English liberal revolution of the 19th. But things didn’t stop there. Prominent thinkers of the time like Du Bois and Luther King,all rested their arguments on the idea that people should be judged on the basis of their own abilities.I would agree with a reworded version of Mankiw’s principle: someone who contributes more to prosperity deserves a higher income that reflects their greater contribution.There is more to meritocracy than money-making.The meritocratic idea tries to address two of the great problems at the heart of modernity: how do we reconcile the moral equality of individuals with social differentiation? And how do we secure the economic growth that pays for the things we have come to expect, such as social welfare?Meritocracy answers the first question by providing a combination of equality of opportunity and competition. Universal education gives everybody a basic shot at succeeding. Competition allows people to discover their unique talents. And if competition has downsides, they are nothing compared with the risks of allowing talents to go undiscovered.The evidence that meritocracy promotes economic efficiency is overwhelming: meritocratic countries such as Singapore grow more robustly than non-meritocratic ones such as Greece; public companies that recruit people on merit are more successful than family companies that rely on nepotism.The solution to the inequalities produced by meritocracy’s success is to tax the winners rather than to bind Prometheus.Q. The authors view on the principle of just deserts differs from that of Mankiw in which of the following ways?

View answer

Sujoy, Mritunjoy and Paranjoy are three friends, who have worked in software firms Z Solutions, G Softwares and R Mindpoyver respectively for a decade. The friends decided to float a new software firm named XY Infotech in January 2010. However, due to certain compulsions, Mritunjoy and Paranjoy were not able to immediately join the start-up in the appointed time. It was decided between friends that Sujoy will be running the venture as the full time Director during 2010, and Mritunjoy and Paranjoy will be able to join the business only in January 2011. In order to compensate Sujoy for his efforts, it was decided that he will receive 10 percent of the profits and in the first year will invest lesser amount as compared to his friends. The remaining profit will be distributed among the friends in line with their contribution. Sujoy invested Rs. 35,000/- for 12 months, Mritunjoy invested Rs. 1,30,000/- for 6 months and Paranjoy invested Rs. 75,000/- for 8 months. If the total profit earned during 2010 was Rs. 4,50,000/-, then Paranjoy earned a profit of

View answer

Sujoy, Mritunjoy and Paranjoy are three friends, who have worked in software firmsZ Solutions, G SoftwaresandR Mindpoyverrespectively for a decade. The friends decided to float a new software firm namedXY Infotechin January 2010. However, due to certain compulsions, Mritunjoy and Paranjoy were not able to immediately join the start-up in the appointed time. It was decided between friends that Sujoy will be running the venture as the full time Director during 2010, and Mritunjoy and Paranjoy will be able to join the business only in January 2011. In order to compensate Sujoy for his efforts, it was decided that he will receive 10 percent of the profits and in the first year will invest lesser amount as compared to his friends. The remaining profit will be distributed among the friends in line with their contribution. Sujoy invested Rs. 35,000/- for 12 months, Mritunjoy invested Rs. 1,30,000/- for 6 months and Paranjoy invested Rs. 75,000/- for 8 months. If the total profit earned during 2010 was Rs. 4,50,000/-, then Paranjoy earned a profit of

View answer

Sam and his 8 friends plan to rent an apartment for a duration of 15 days, by shelling out equal amount towards the rent. Contributing a particular amount, they each fall short of Rs.40. Sam observes that had there been 12 of them, they could have just paid the rent by contributing exactly the same amount. The rent and the amount each of them contribute are

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Three drunkards agreed to pool their vodka and decided to share it with the fourth drunkard (who had no vodka) at a price equal to 5 roubles a litre. The first drunkard contributed 1 litre more than the second and the second contributed 1 litre more than the third. Then, all four of them divided the vodka equally and drank it. The fourth drunkard paid money, which was divided in the ratio of each drunkards contribution towards his portion. It was found that the first drunkard got twice as much money as the second. How much money did the second drunkard get (in roubles)?a)10b)8c)5d)Data insufficientCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam