What distinguishes the Mauryan pillars from the Achamenian pillars?a)T...
Mauryan pillars are rock-cut and different from the Achamenian pillars.
What distinguishes the Mauryan pillars from the Achamenian pillars?a)T...
Method of Construction:
The key distinguishing factor between Mauryan pillars and Achaemenian pillars lies in the method of construction. Mauryan pillars were constructed using the technique of monolithic construction, which means that they were carved from a single piece of stone. On the other hand, Achaemenian pillars were typically constructed using a combination of materials such as stone blocks or bricks.
Mauryan Pillars:
Mauryan pillars, such as the famous Ashoka pillars, were meticulously carved from a single piece of stone, often made from polished sandstone. These pillars were known for their impressive height and intricate carvings, which included depictions of animals, plants, and inscriptions.
Achaemenian Pillars:
In contrast, Achaemenian pillars, found in ancient Persia, were constructed using a combination of stone blocks or bricks. These pillars were usually adorned with intricate reliefs and carvings, showcasing the artistic and architectural prowess of the Achaemenian Empire.
Significance of Construction:
The method of construction not only influenced the visual appeal of the pillars but also reflected the technological advancements and cultural preferences of the respective civilizations. While Mauryan pillars showcased the skill and precision of monolithic construction, Achaemenian pillars highlighted the use of diverse materials and techniques in architectural design.