Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >   In the question given below, Some statements... Start Learning for Free
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.
Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.
Conclusions:
I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.
II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.
  • a)
    A
  • b)
    B
  • c)
    C
  • d)
    D
  • e)
    E
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conc...
Both the conclusions talk about the negative and incorrect development policy of the current government ruling the neighbouring states of Kerala, which led to the disturbance in the Western Ghats ecology.
Free Test
Community Answer
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conc...
Analysis:
The given statements talk about the debate on the impact of political decisions on the recent floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka. Let's analyze the conclusions based on the given statements.

Conclusion I:
The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.
- This conclusion directly reflects the statement that political expediency may have trumped science in the Western Ghats. It implies that incorrect environmental policy decisions could have led to the catastrophic floods in Kerala.
- Hence, this conclusion logically follows from the given statements.

Conclusion II:
The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.
- This conclusion suggests that focusing more on human development policies and neglecting the protection of Western Ghats ecology could have contributed to the floods.
- While the given statements do talk about policy decisions affecting the Western Ghats, they do not specifically mention the prioritization of human development policies over ecological protection.
- Hence, this conclusion is not directly supported by the given statements.

Conclusion:
Both conclusions I and II have been analyzed based on the given statements. Conclusion I logically follows from the statements, while conclusion II does not have enough direct support. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'E' - If both conclusions I and II follow.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev