Question Description
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice In the question given below, Some statements are followed by two conclusions numbered l and ll. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. (A) If only conclusion l follows. (B) If only conclusion ll follows. (C) If either conclusion l or ll follows. (D) If neither conclusion l nor ll follows. (E) If both conclusions l and ll follow.Statement: The catastrophic monsoon floods in Kerala and parts of Karnataka have revived the debate on whether political expediency trumped science of the Western Ghats due to the short-sighted policy making by the neighboring states, i.e. Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Maharashtra.Conclusions:I. The recent havoc in Kerala is a consequence of the incorrect environmental policy decisions.II. The stronger human development policy with weaker protection of Western Ghats ecology is one of the main reasons.a)Ab)Bc)Cd)De)ECorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.