Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Directions: The question consists of two stat...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.
Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.
Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.
Q. Is it a valid contract?
Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.
Q. Is it a valid contract?
- a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.
- b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.
- c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.
- d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as P...
In the given situation, Robert has misrepresented the mileage of the car to induce Daniel into buying the car. Thus, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation of Robert. Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals with this situation. The valid contracts are all those contracts when all parties agree to the agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other). Something of value must be exchanged, such as cash, services or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as P...
Understanding the Principle
The principle states that a contract entered into based on misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party. Misrepresentation occurs when one party provides false information that induces another party to enter into a contract.
Application of the Principle to the Facts
In the given facts, Robert intentionally deceives Daniel by claiming that his car provides a mileage of 20 km/hr, while it only delivers 10 km/hr. This misrepresentation directly influences Daniel's decision to buy the car.
Reasons for the Answer
- Intent to Deceive: Robert's statement was not a mere exaggeration; it was a calculated falsehood aimed at inducing Daniel into the contract.
- Inducement: Daniel relied on Robert's false claim when agreeing to purchase the car. His decision was based on the misleading information provided.
- Voidable Contract: Since the contract was entered into based on misrepresentation, Daniel has the legal right to void the contract. This means he can choose to cancel the agreement if he wishes.
Conclusion
Thus, the correct answer is option 'A': "No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert." Daniel can choose to either proceed with the contract or rescind it, thereby protecting himself from the fraudulent claim made by Robert.
The principle states that a contract entered into based on misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party. Misrepresentation occurs when one party provides false information that induces another party to enter into a contract.
Application of the Principle to the Facts
In the given facts, Robert intentionally deceives Daniel by claiming that his car provides a mileage of 20 km/hr, while it only delivers 10 km/hr. This misrepresentation directly influences Daniel's decision to buy the car.
Reasons for the Answer
- Intent to Deceive: Robert's statement was not a mere exaggeration; it was a calculated falsehood aimed at inducing Daniel into the contract.
- Inducement: Daniel relied on Robert's false claim when agreeing to purchase the car. His decision was based on the misleading information provided.
- Voidable Contract: Since the contract was entered into based on misrepresentation, Daniel has the legal right to void the contract. This means he can choose to cancel the agreement if he wishes.
Conclusion
Thus, the correct answer is option 'A': "No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert." Daniel can choose to either proceed with the contract or rescind it, thereby protecting himself from the fraudulent claim made by Robert.
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts
Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup