Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Directions: The question consists of two stat...

Join the Discussion on the App

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.

Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.
Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.
Q. Is it a valid contract?

a)
No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.
b)
Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.
c)
No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.
d)
No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Legal Studies: CUET Mock Test - 10

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as P...

In the given situation, Robert has misrepresented the mileage of the car to induce Daniel into buying the car. Thus, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation of Robert. Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals with this situation. The valid contracts are all those contracts when all parties agree to the agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other). Something of value must be exchanged, such as cash, services or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value.

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

Attention Humanities/Arts Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts: Tarun contracts with Sohan to kidnap a child from their locality for ransom money of Rs. 1 crores. Tarun agrees to pay the entire amount to Sohan in return of the kidnapping of child.Q. Is it a valid contract?

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: No person attending any educational institution recognised by the state or receiving aid out of state funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.Facts: Junaid was a boy of a Muslim family and son of Mr. Ajiz Khan. He went to the school nearby called St. Barbosa. The school had predominantly the students coming from the Christian religion. In the morning assembly, the students were asked to sing hymns of Bible and other Christian literature praising Lord Jesus. Junaid was reluctant to do so, and he was punished for that. His father sued the school.

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE(S) and the other as FACTS. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given statements carefully and select the best option.Principle: A contract which is impossible to perform is void ab initio and not enforceable in the court of law.Facts: There is a contract between A and B where A will pay Rs. 1,00,000/- to B if B marries C. But C was dead 5 years ago. What is the legal standing of the contract?

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Property rights are not perpetual and die with the land.Facts: Rehan purchased a piece of land in Kashmir and started a small school over there. The school had about 500 enrollments and was running smoothly. The school, however, deteriorated during a landslide and Rehan claimed enforcement of his property rights from the government.

View answer

The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Nuisance as a tort (civil wrong) means an unlawful interference with a persons use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it.FACT: During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendants shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 Kg. of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighboring shops. The neighboring shopkeepers brought an action for nuisance against the defendant.

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam