Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle and apply it to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: A contract entered into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party.Facts: Robert, with an intention to deceive Daniel falsely, stated that his car gives a mileage of 20 km/hr. In reality, the car gives only a mileage of 10 km/hr. Daniel gets induced and agrees to buy the car.Q.Is it a valid contract?a)No, the contract is voidable at the option of Daniel due to misrepresentation by Robert.b)Yes, the contract is a valid one and Daniel must buy the car.c)No, the contract is void due to false claims made by Robert in relation to his car.d)No, because the price of the contract could be reduced to commensurate with the reduced mileage of the car.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.