All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without dam... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Injuria Sine Damnum means
  • a)
    injury without damage
  • b)
    in the present state
  • c)
    evil in itself
  • d)
    damage without injury
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present state...
Injuria sine damnum is a violation of a legal right without causing any harm, loss or damage to the plaintiff and whenever any legal right is infringed, the person in whom the right is vested is entitled to bring an action. The law even gives the liberty that if a person merely has a threat of infringement of a legal right even without the injury being completed, the person whose right has been threatened can bring a suit under the provisions of Specific Relief Act.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present state...
Injuria Sine Damnum is a Latin term that is commonly used in tort law. It refers to a situation where there is an injury or violation of a legal right without any accompanying damage or loss.

Explanation:
- Injuria Sine Damnum is derived from two Latin words: "injuria" meaning injury, and "sine damnum" meaning without damage.
- In legal terms, an injury refers to the infringement or violation of a legal right. It can be a physical injury or harm caused to a person, or it can be an infringement of a person's legal rights such as defamation, invasion of privacy, or interference with contractual relations.
- On the other hand, damage refers to the actual loss or harm suffered by an individual as a result of the injury. It can be a financial loss, physical harm, loss of reputation, or any other measurable loss.

Examples:
- An example of injuria sine damnum is a case where someone spreads false rumors about another person, causing harm to their reputation, but without resulting in any financial or tangible loss. In this case, there is an injury (defamation) without any accompanying damage.
- Another example is when a person is wrongfully denied entry to a public place or denied a service based on their race or religion. In this case, there is an injury (discrimination) without any resulting damage.

Significance:
- Injuria Sine Damnum is an important concept in tort law as it recognizes that certain injuries or violations of legal rights may not always result in tangible or measurable losses.
- It allows the injured party to seek legal remedies, such as an injunction or a declaration of rights, even if there is no accompanying damage. This ensures that individuals are protected from any unjust or wrongful actions, regardless of whether they suffer any financial or tangible losses.
- However, it's important to note that in order to establish a claim based on injuria sine damnum, it is necessary to prove that there has been an infringement or violation of a legal right, even if there is no accompanying damage.

In conclusion, injuria sine damnum refers to an injury or violation of a legal right without any accompanying damage or loss. It is an important concept in tort law that recognizes that individuals have a right to seek legal remedies even if they do not suffer any tangible or measurable losses as a result of the injury.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Arbitration has been the toast of the legal community for a long time. It has been long expected that arbitration will replace business litigation to a great extent one day. Lawyers have been encouraging parties to have an arbitration agreement in all their business transaction documents for more than two decades now. However, arbitration has not been proven to be effective too often.A lot of lawyers have begun to re-evaluate if they should put in those arbitration clauses blindly in the agreements they draft. Also, a lot of people who have already put in binding arbitration clauses in their agreements, are finding arbitration very difficult to navigate and too expensive when disputes actually arise.Even after 23 years since the introduction of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, arbitration seems to be slowly evolving and not really making a dent on pendency of litigation situation and more costly unlike litigation. The Act empowers the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings where without any sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim within the stipulated period. If the respondent fails to submit his statement of defence within the predetermined period, the arbitrator shall continue with the proceedings without treating such a failure in itself as an admission of claimants allegations.Would it ever become the mature alternative that Indian businesses can safely rely on for reliable, fast, efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, especially given the terrible state of civil justice?The BN Srikrishna Committee Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India states that a lack of governmental support to promote arbitration is also one of the reasons why arbitration has not become the most preferred way of resolution. The report goes on to suggest that there should be awareness programmes and training to make arbitration a more popular concept. However, such awareness campaigns are very unlikely to attract parties to arbitration given the way it functions at present.Quality of arbitration and arbitrators can often be suspect. The courts have settled the legal proposition that an arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. Courts in India regularly interfere and do not respect party autonomy. The award is expected to be up for appeal or review in the higher courts and that really does not instill confidence in the parties involved in disputes. These factors are putting off parties from adopting arbitration. At present, it appears that only in a handful of matters involving very large claims, arbitration is still viable in India.Q.Chand was alleged by Suraj on the acquisition of his house in Delhi which was decided to be dealt under the Arbitration Act. The arbitrator asked Chand to submit his statement within a month. Chand failed to submit his statement within the stipulated time. The arbitrator terminated the proceedings on account that Chand failed to submit the statement. Is the termination valid?

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Assault is typically defined as an intentional act that puts another individual in apprehension of immediate harm. Assault thus criminalises the threat of harm itself, rather than requiring that actual harm has occurred. For this reason, it is sometimes also known as attempted battery. Since assault is an intentional act, it cannot be committed by accident. This means that a perpetrator must have intended to cause fear in another person, or that he or she acted in a way that was knowingly dangerous, even if a specific individual was not targeted. Assault does not require that the victim feared is subjected to severe bodily harm or death. Any reasonable fear is sufficient.Assault also requires that an act be taken in furtherance of the threat of harm. This could be any variety of acts, including approaching someone with raised fists, scaring someone with a weapon, or attempting to push an individual into a crowded street. However, some sort of act is required. Simply stating a threat is not enough to create an assault unless the words are accompanied by an additional action that creates a fear of harm.Battery is, in many ways, the completion of an assault. Battery is defined as an intentional offensive or harmful touching of another person that is done without his or her consent. Since an assault is the threatening of harm, and a battery is the actual act of harm, the two crimes are often charged together. As with assault, battery requires that the perpetrator intended to commit the act.The act of battery does not require that the victim is severely injured or traumatised. Any type of touching that the victim considers harmful or offensive can be sufficient. For example, if a woman pours a mug of hot water on someone else, this could be a battery. To go even further, a classic case of a battery that does not result in pain or injury is when the perpetrator spits on the victim. However, a defendant will not be held liable for contact that is deemed offensive only because the victim is abnormally sensitive. The standard of offensiveness is determined from the perspective of an ordinary individual.When the conduct of a defendant is particularly egregious, he or she may be charged with the elevated crime of aggravated assault or battery. This can vary by state, but it is generally meant to criminalise conduct that society finds particularly offensive. Thus, for instance, aggravated assault may apply to circumstances when a deadly weapon, such as a gun, is used, or when the victim is particularly vulnerable, such as a pregnant woman or an elderly individual. In some states, if the harm done to the victim is particularly severe and causes serious and lasting injury, the assault or battery will be charged as aggravated. If the perpetrators actions could have caused death, the defendant will face a charge of attempted murder and manslaughter.Q.A hits B with an iron rod. This leads to Bs leg being fractured. What can be the charge against A?

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Injuria Sine Damnum meansa)injury without damageb)in the present statec)evil in itselfd)damage without injuryCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup