Question Description
Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.a)Satyam will succeed, since even though the police personnel had entered into the land of Satyam accidentally, tort of trespass has been committed.b)Satyam will succeed, since the police had entered the land without lawful justification.c)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had entered the land only to catch the thief and not to interfere with someones possession of land.d)Satyam will not succeed, since the police had interfered with his possession of land with lawful justification, i.e. to catch hold of the thief.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.