Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Directions: The following question consists o... Start Learning for Free
Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.
Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.
Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.
Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?
  • a)
    The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.
  • b)
    The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employee's carelessness.
  • c)
    The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/pri...
According to the given principle, a person will be liable for the act of others if it is done in the course of employment. It is immaterial whether the employee was doing the act with due care or not. So, in the given case, as the explosion occurred during the course of employment of the lorry driver, the employer will be vicariously liable.
Therefore, option 4 is the answer.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Consists of legal proposition(s) principle(s) (herein after referred to as principl e) and facts. Such principle may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles those are given herein below for every question.Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to testy your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability, even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.Therefore, to answer a question, principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.Principle: A violation of a legal right of someone, whether results in a legal injury or not, gives rise to an action in tort for compensation. At the same time, an action by someone, which results in some loss or damage to somebody else is not actionable, if there is no violation of a right of that somebody.Facts: AB Coaching Centre was a popular CLAT coaching academy with several good trainers. A lot of aspirants used to attend its coaching classes from all over and was making good profit. This was going on for the past several years. During a session, T, one of the very good and popular trainer of ABCC, has some difference of opinion with the owner of ABCC and left the coaching centre. In August 20162016, T started another Entrance Coaching Centre closer to ABCC which resulted in a substantial drop in its students and huge financial loss. The owner of ABCCABCC wants to file a case against T for the loss sustained by ABCC. What do you think is the right legal position?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The following question consists of a legal proposition/principle (hereinafter referred to as principle) and facts. This principle has to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principle may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume it to be true for the purpose of the question. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given herein below for the given question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than the facts stated in the question. The objective of this question is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the object of this question to test your knowledge of law.Principle: A person is responsible for his own act of omission and commission, but in certain cases a person is liable for the act of others. The wrongful act of others must be done within the course of employment. This is known as vicarious liability.Facts: A careless petrol lorry driver during his working hours was smoking whilst transferring petrol from a tanker to a tank. The employee was carrying out an authorised task (transferring petrol) in an unauthorised manner (whilst smoking) which results into explosion.Q. Is the employer liable for the act of the employee?a)The employer is not liable because the task of the lorry driver was in unauthorised manner.b)The employer is not liable because an employer cannot be held liable for an employees carelessness.c)The employer is liable to the extent of his own act only.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev