Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Questions  >  For the preparation of approximate estimates,... Start Learning for Free
For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.
  • a)
    True
  • b)
    False
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method ...
For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method. Cubical contents method is usually used for multi-storeyed buildings.
Free Test
Community Answer
For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method ...
Introduction:
The cubical contents method, unit base method, and plinth area method are all widely used techniques for estimating construction costs. However, when it comes to the preparation of approximate estimates, the cubical contents method is considered to be more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.

Explanation:
The cubical contents method calculates the estimate based on the total volume or cubic contents of a building. This method takes into account the length, width, and height of the building, as well as the number of floors. By considering the total volume of the building, the cubical contents method provides a more accurate estimate of the construction cost.

On the other hand, the unit base method calculates the estimate based on the cost per unit area of the building. This method takes into account the total area of each floor, including the plinth area, and multiplies it by the cost per unit area. While this method is widely used and provides a quick estimate, it does not take into consideration the height or volume of the building. As a result, the estimate may not accurately reflect the actual cost of construction.

Similarly, the plinth area method calculates the estimate based on the plinth area of the building, which is the total built-up area at the floor level. This method is commonly used for residential buildings and calculates the estimate by multiplying the plinth area by the cost per unit area. However, like the unit base method, the plinth area method does not consider the volume of the building, leading to potential inaccuracies in the estimate.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, for the preparation of approximate estimates, the cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method. While the unit base method and plinth area method provide quick estimates, they do not take into consideration the volume of the building, which can lead to inaccuracies. Therefore, for a more precise estimate, the cubical contents method is recommended as it considers the total volume of the building.
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Civil Engineering (CE) 2024 is part of Civil Engineering (CE) preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Civil Engineering (CE) exam syllabus. Information about For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Civil Engineering (CE) 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Civil Engineering (CE). Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Civil Engineering (CE) Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice For the preparation of approximate estimates, cubical contents method is more accurate than the unit base method and plinth area method.a)Trueb)FalseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Civil Engineering (CE) tests.
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev