Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Which of the following is not the function of... Start Learning for Free
Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?
  • a)
    To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victim
  • b)
    To promote research in the field of human rights
  • c)
    To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the court
  • d)
    To protect the human rights of prisoners
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Right...
The specific legislation called the Protection of Human Rights Act was enacted by the Parliament in 1993, which in turn established the National Human Rights Commission as an independent institution with powers and functions to promote and protect human rights. The Commission is vested with the following functions:
  1. The Commission may, with the permission of the court, intervene in court proceedings concerning human rights violations.
  2. The Commission may also visit any jail or other governmental institutions, where prisoners are lodged or detained, to study the living conditions of the inmates and make recommendations to the government.
  3. The Commission can undertake and promote research in the field of human rights as well as spread human rights literacy among various sections of society.
Lastly, the Commission can encourage and support the efforts of non-governmental organizations and institutions involved with human rights work.
Thus, the National Human Rights Commission does not have the right to either penalize the guilty of human rights violation or to provide any financial assistance to the victim.
Free Test
Community Answer
Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Right...
Explanation:

Function of the National Human Rights Commission:
- To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victim: This is not a function of the National Human Rights Commission. The Commission's main role is to protect and promote human rights, investigate complaints of violations, and make recommendations to the government for action. However, the Commission does not have the authority to provide economic compensation to victims of human rights violations. This responsibility usually falls under the jurisdiction of the courts or other relevant authorities.
- To promote research in the field of human rights: One of the functions of the National Human Rights Commission is to promote research in the field of human rights. By conducting research and studies, the Commission can gain a better understanding of human rights issues, trends, and challenges, which can help in formulating effective policies and interventions.
- To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the court: The National Human Rights Commission has the authority to intervene in legal proceedings related to human rights violations. This may include monitoring the progress of cases, providing legal assistance to victims, and ensuring that justice is served in a timely and fair manner.
- To protect the human rights of prisoners: Another important function of the National Human Rights Commission is to protect the human rights of prisoners. This includes monitoring prison conditions, investigating complaints of abuse or mistreatment, and advocating for the rights of prisoners to be respected and upheld.
In conclusion, providing economic compensation to human rights violation victims is not a function of the National Human Rights Commission. Instead, the Commission focuses on investigating complaints, promoting research, intervening in legal proceedings, and protecting the rights of individuals, including prisoners.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Arbitration has been the toast of the legal community for a long time. It has been long expected that arbitration will replace business litigation to a great extent one day. Lawyers have been encouraging parties to have an arbitration agreement in all their business transaction documents for more than two decades now. However, arbitration has not been proven to be effective too often.A lot of lawyers have begun to re-evaluate if they should put in those arbitration clauses blindly in the agreements they draft. Also, a lot of people who have already put in binding arbitration clauses in their agreements, are finding arbitration very difficult to navigate and too expensive when disputes actually arise.Even after 23 years since the introduction of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, arbitration seems to be slowly evolving and not really making a dent on pendency of litigation situation and more costly unlike litigation. The Act empowers the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings where without any sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim within the stipulated period. If the respondent fails to submit his statement of defence within the predetermined period, the arbitrator shall continue with the proceedings without treating such a failure in itself as an admission of claimants allegations.Would it ever become the mature alternative that Indian businesses can safely rely on for reliable, fast, efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, especially given the terrible state of civil justice?The BN Srikrishna Committee Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India states that a lack of governmental support to promote arbitration is also one of the reasons why arbitration has not become the most preferred way of resolution. The report goes on to suggest that there should be awareness programmes and training to make arbitration a more popular concept. However, such awareness campaigns are very unlikely to attract parties to arbitration given the way it functions at present.Quality of arbitration and arbitrators can often be suspect. The courts have settled the legal proposition that an arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. Courts in India regularly interfere and do not respect party autonomy. The award is expected to be up for appeal or review in the higher courts and that really does not instill confidence in the parties involved in disputes. These factors are putting off parties from adopting arbitration. At present, it appears that only in a handful of matters involving very large claims, arbitration is still viable in India.Q.Chand was alleged by Suraj on the acquisition of his house in Delhi which was decided to be dealt under the Arbitration Act. The arbitrator asked Chand to submit his statement within a month. Chand failed to submit his statement within the stipulated time. The arbitrator terminated the proceedings on account that Chand failed to submit the statement. Is the termination valid?

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Arbitration has been the toast of the legal community for a long time. It has been long expected that arbitration will replace business litigation to a great extent one day. Lawyers have been encouraging parties to have an arbitration agreement in all their business transaction documents for more than two decades now. However, arbitration has not been proven to be effective too often.A lot of lawyers have begun to re-evaluate if they should put in those arbitration clauses blindly in the agreements they draft. Also, a lot of people who have already put in binding arbitration clauses in their agreements, are finding arbitration very difficult to navigate and too expensive when disputes actually arise.Even after 23 years since the introduction of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, arbitration seems to be slowly evolving and not really making a dent on pendency of litigation situation and more costly unlike litigation. The Act empowers the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings where without any sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim within the stipulated period. If the respondent fails to submit his statement of defence within the predetermined period, the arbitrator shall continue with the proceedings without treating such a failure in itself as an admission of claimants allegations.Would it ever become the mature alternative that Indian businesses can safely rely on for reliable, fast, efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, especially given the terrible state of civil justice?The BN Srikrishna Committee Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India states that a lack of governmental support to promote arbitration is also one of the reasons why arbitration has not become the most preferred way of resolution. The report goes on to suggest that there should be awareness programmes and training to make arbitration a more popular concept. However, such awareness campaigns are very unlikely to attract parties to arbitration given the way it functions at present.Quality of arbitration and arbitrators can often be suspect. The courts have settled the legal proposition that an arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. Courts in India regularly interfere and do not respect party autonomy. The award is expected to be up for appeal or review in the higher courts and that really does not instill confidence in the parties involved in disputes. These factors are putting off parties from adopting arbitration. At present, it appears that only in a handful of matters involving very large claims, arbitration is still viable in India.Q.According to the passage, what is a necessary component to enable arbitration between parties in a dispute?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following is not the function of the National Human Rights Commission?a)To provide economic compensation to any human rights violation victimb)To promote research in the field of human rightsc)To interfere in the proceedings related to any human rights violation case pending in the courtd)To protect the human rights of prisonersCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev