Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  What were the arguments against separate elec... Start Learning for Free
What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?
A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minorities
B. Feared continued civ il war riots and violence
C. It would div ide the people
D. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshed
E. It would create harmony amongst communities.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
  • a)
    B, C, D Only
  • b)
    E, A, B Only
  • c)
    A, B, D Only
  • d)
    E, A, D Only
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in...
Arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly:

B. Feared continued civil war riots and violence
- One of the arguments against separate electorates put forward by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly was the fear of continued civil war riots and violence. They believed that separate electorates based on religion or community would only further divide the people and lead to conflicts and tensions between different groups.

C. It would divide the people
- Another argument against separate electorates was that it would divide the people based on their religious or community affiliations. The leaders believed that a united and cohesive society could not be built if people were segregated into separate electorates. They emphasized the importance of a unified electorate system that would promote inclusivity and equal representation for all citizens.

D. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshed
- The leaders in the Constituent Assembly also pointed out that separate electorates had already played a significant role in the partition of India in 1947, leading to widespread bloodshed and communal violence. They argued that continuing with separate electorates would only perpetuate these conflicts and hinder the process of nation-building.

A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minorities
- This option is incorrect as the leaders in the Constituent Assembly did not argue in favor of separate electorates guaranteeing freedom to minorities. Instead, they believed that a united and inclusive electorate system would ensure equal representation and protection of the rights of all citizens, including minorities.

E. It would create harmony amongst communities
- This option is also incorrect as the leaders in the Constituent Assembly did not believe that separate electorates would create harmony among communities. On the contrary, they argued that separate electorates would further divide and fragment society, leading to conflicts and tensions between different groups.

In conclusion, the arguments against separate electorates put forward by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly were primarily based on the fear of continued violence and civil war, the belief that it would divide the people, and the recognition that it had already led to partition and bloodshed. They emphasized the importance of a united and inclusive electorate system that would promote harmony, equal representation, and the protection of the rights of all citizens.
Free Test
Community Answer
What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in...
The leaders in the Constituent Assembly were against separate electorates for several reasons:
1. Feared continued civil war, riots, and violence (B):
  • Leaders believed that separate electorates would perpetuate the divide among different communities, leading to tensions and potential violence.
  • They wanted to create a united India where people from different backgrounds could live in peace and harmony.
2. It would divide the people (C):
  • The idea of separate electorates was seen as divisive, as it would lead to a fragmented society where different groups would be focused on their own interests rather than the common good.
  • The leaders believed in the concept of a single, united Indian nation, and separate electorates went against this principle.
3. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshed (D):
  • The leaders were aware of the fact that separate electorates had played a significant role in the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan.
  • They did not want to follow a path that had already led to so much bloodshed and suffering, and instead wanted to create a more inclusive and united political system.
In conclusion, the leaders in the Constituent Assembly were against separate electorates primarily due to the fear of continued violence, the divisive nature of the concept, and the historical precedent of partition and bloodshed. Their opposition was based on the belief in a united and inclusive India, where all communities could come together for the common good.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Please read the passage and answer the questions that follows.The members of the Constituent Assembly were not elected on the basis of universal franchise. In the winter of 1945-46 provincial elections were held in India.The Provincial legislatures then chose the representatives of the Constituent Assembly. The Constituent Assembly that came into being was dominated by one party: the Congress. The Congress swept the general seats in the provincial elections, and the Muslim League captured most of the reserved Muslim seats. But the league chose to boycott the Constituent Assembly, pressing its demand for Pakistan with a separate constitution. The socialists too wereinitially unwilling to join, for they believed the Constituent Assembly was a creation of the British, and therefore incapable of being truly autonomous. In effect, therefore, 82 per cent of the members of the Constituent Assembly were also members of the Congress.The Congress however was not a party with one voice.Its members differed in their opinion on critical issues.Some members were inspired by socialism while others were defenders of landlordism. Some were close to communal parties while others were assertively secular.Through the national movement Congress members had learnt to debate their ideas in public and negotiate their differences, Within the Constituent Assembly too.Congress membQ. Based on the information given about making of the Constituent Assembly.Choose the most suitable combination from the following options:A. 82% of the members of the Constituent Assembly were also members of the CongressB. The socialists were initially unwilling to join, for they believed the Constituent Assembly was a creation of the British, and therefore incapable of being truly autonomous.C. The Muslim league swept the general seats in the provincial electionsD. T he Muslim league chose to boycott the Constituent Assembly, pressing its demand for Pakistan with a separate constitutionChoose the correct answer from the options given below

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What were the arguments against separate electorates by the leaders in the Constituent Assembly ?A. Separate electorates would guarantee freedom to minoritiesB. Feared continued civ il war riots and violenceC. It would div ide the peopleD. It had led to partition and would continue to cause bloodshedE. It would create harmony amongst communities.Choose the correct answer from the options given below:a)B, C, D Onlyb)E, A, B Onlyc)A, B, D Onlyd)E, A, D OnlyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev