Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Directions: Please read the passage and answe...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:
Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily show's how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nation's vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.
From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nation's property in all parts of India.
Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.
Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.
The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.
This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.
Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily show's how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nation's vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.
From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nation's property in all parts of India.
Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.
Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.
The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.
This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.
Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:
- a)Submissive
- b)Dissatisfaction
- c)Apathy
- d)Enthusiasm
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follo...
- The salt tax was a heavy burden on the Indian population, but it remained in place for a long time due to the general public's apathy.
- Apathy refers to a lack of interest, concern, or enthusiasm.
- Mahatma Gandhi's writing suggests that the public was not sufficiently engaged or aware of the negative impacts of the salt tax.
- It was only when the public's awareness and concern increased that there was a push to abolish the tax.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follo...
Understanding the Public Attitude Towards the Salt Tax
The passage highlights the general public's attitude towards the salt tax imposed by the British government in India. While the initial perception might suggest various feelings, the text specifically mentions apathy as the prevailing sentiment before the public's awakening.
Key Points Supporting Apathy
- Lack of Awareness: The text indicates that the salt tax has persisted largely due to the "apathy of the general public." This suggests that many were either unaware of the tax's severity or indifferent to its implications.
- Complacency: The passage emphasizes that the tax had remained for a long time, which implies a degree of complacency among the populace. People might have accepted the tax as a norm without questioning its fairness or necessity.
- Need for Mobilization: Gandhi mentions that the public's awakening is crucial for abolishing the tax. This indicates that prior to this awakening, there was a lack of active resistance or organized protest against the tax, reinforcing the idea of apathy.
Contrast with Other Emotions
- Dissatisfaction and Enthusiasm: While there may have been underlying dissatisfaction with the salt tax, the text does not emphasize this. Instead, it points to a collective inertia rather than a mobilized dissatisfaction. Enthusiasm for change is only hinted at as a potential future development once the public becomes aware and roused.
- Submissive Attitude: The public's attitude cannot be classified as submissive since that implies a recognition of authority and a willingness to comply. Instead, apathy suggests a lack of engagement or refusal to acknowledge the issue.
Conclusion
In summary, the general public of India exhibited apathy towards the salt tax, characterized by ignorance and indifference, until a collective realization prompted a call for action and change.
The passage highlights the general public's attitude towards the salt tax imposed by the British government in India. While the initial perception might suggest various feelings, the text specifically mentions apathy as the prevailing sentiment before the public's awakening.
Key Points Supporting Apathy
- Lack of Awareness: The text indicates that the salt tax has persisted largely due to the "apathy of the general public." This suggests that many were either unaware of the tax's severity or indifferent to its implications.
- Complacency: The passage emphasizes that the tax had remained for a long time, which implies a degree of complacency among the populace. People might have accepted the tax as a norm without questioning its fairness or necessity.
- Need for Mobilization: Gandhi mentions that the public's awakening is crucial for abolishing the tax. This indicates that prior to this awakening, there was a lack of active resistance or organized protest against the tax, reinforcing the idea of apathy.
Contrast with Other Emotions
- Dissatisfaction and Enthusiasm: While there may have been underlying dissatisfaction with the salt tax, the text does not emphasize this. Instead, it points to a collective inertia rather than a mobilized dissatisfaction. Enthusiasm for change is only hinted at as a potential future development once the public becomes aware and roused.
- Submissive Attitude: The public's attitude cannot be classified as submissive since that implies a recognition of authority and a willingness to comply. Instead, apathy suggests a lack of engagement or refusal to acknowledge the issue.
Conclusion
In summary, the general public of India exhibited apathy towards the salt tax, characterized by ignorance and indifference, until a collective realization prompted a call for action and change.
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. The attitude of the general public of India towards the salt tax was:a)Submissiveb)Dissatisfactionc)Apathyd)EnthusiasmCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup