All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
SAT Exam  >  SAT Questions  >  1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,... Start Learning for Free
1 kilo liter in milliliters
  • a)
    10,00,000
  • b)
    1,00,000
  • c)
    10,000
  • d)
    1,000
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your SAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct...
Formula used:
1 kilo = 1000
1 liter = 1000 mililiters
Calculation:
1-kilo liter = 1 kilo × 1 liter
⇒ 1-kilo liter = 1000 × 1000 mililiters
⇒ 1-kilo liter = 10,00,000 mililiters.
∴ The answer is 10,00,000.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Question based on the following passage and supplementary material.This passage is adapted from Kevin Drum, “Americas Real Criminal Element: Lead" ©2013 Mother Jones.Experts often suggest that crime resemblesan epidemic. But what kind? Economicsprofessor Karl Smith has a good rule of thumbfor categorizing epidemics: If it spreads along(5) lines of communication, he says, the cause isinformation. Think Bieber Fever.* If it travelsalong major transportation routes, the cause ismicrobial. Think influenza. If it spreads out likea fan, the cause is an insect. Think malaria. But(10) if its everywhere, all at once—as both the rise ofcrime in the 60s and 70s and the fall of crime inthe 90s seemed to be—the cause is a molecule.A molecule? That sounds crazy. Whatmolecule could be responsible for a steep and(15) sudden decline in violent crime?Well, heres one possibility: Pb(CH2CH3)4.In 1994, Rick Nevin was a consultantworking for the US Department of Housing andUrban Development on the costs and benefits of(20) removing lead paint from old houses. A growingbody of research had linked lead exposure insmall children with a whole raft of complicationslater in life, including lower IQ, hyperactivity,behavioral problems, and learning disabilities.(25) A recent study had also suggested a linkbetween childhood lead exposure and juveniledelinquency later on. Maybe reducing leadexposure had an effect on violent crime too?That tip took Nevin in a different direction. The(30) biggest source of lead in the postwar era, it turnsout, wasnt paint, but leaded gasoline. If you chartthe rise and fall of atmospheric lead caused bythe rise and fall of leaded gasoline consumption,you get an upside-down U. Lead emissions from(35) tailpipes rose steadily from the early 40s throughthe early 70s, nearly quadrupling over that period.Then, as unleaded gasoline began to replace leadedgasoline, emissions plummeted.Intriguingly, violent crime rates followed the(40) same upside-down U pattern (see the graph). Theonly thing different was the time period. Crimerates rose dramatically in the 60s through the80s, and then began dropping steadily startingin the early 90s. The two curves looked eerily(45) identical, but were offset by about 20 years.So Nevin dug up detailed data on leademissions and crime rates to see if the similarityof the curves was as good as it seemed. It turnedout to be even better. In a 2000 paper he concluded(50) that if you add a lag time of 23 years, leademissions from automobiles explain 90 percent ofthe variation in violent crime in America. Toddlerswho ingested high levels of lead in the 40s and50s really were more likely to become violent(55) criminals in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.And with that we have our molecule: tetra-ethyl lead, the gasoline additive invented byGeneral Motors in the 1920s to prevent knockingand pinging in high-performance engines. As(60) auto sales boomed after World War II, and driversin powerful new cars increasingly asked servicestation attendants to “fill er up with ethyl,” theywere unwittingly creating a crime wave twodecades later.(65) It was an exciting conjecture, and itprompted an immediate wave of . . . nothing.Nevins paper was almost completely ignored,and in one sense its easy to see why—Nevin isan economist, not a criminologist, and his paper(70) was published in Environmental Research, not ajournal with a big readership in the criminologycommunity. Whats more, a single correlationbetween two curves isnt all that impressive,econometrically speaking. Sales of vinyl LPs rose(75) in the postwar period too, and then declined inthe 80s and 90s. No matter how good the fit, ifyou only have a single correlation it might just bea coincidence. You need to do something more toestablish causality.(80) So in 2007, Nevin collected lead data andcrime data for Australia, Canada, Great Britain,Finland, France, Italy, New Zealand and WestGermany. Every time, the two curves fit each otherastonishingly well.(85) The gasoline lead hypothesis helps explainsome things we might not have realized evenneeded explaining. For example, murder rateshave always been higher in big cities than intowns and small cities. Nevin suggests that,(90) because big cities have lots of cars in a smallarea, they also had high densities of atmosphericlead during the postwar era. But as lead levelsin gasoline decreased, the differences betweenbig and small cities largely went away. And guess(95) what? The difference in murder rates went awaytoo. Today, homicide rates are similar in citiesof all sizes. It may be that violent crime isnt aninevitable consequence of being a big city after all.*Enthusiasm for the music and person of Justin Bieber.Q.In the first paragraph, Karl Smith’s work is presented primarily as

Directions: Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of Standard Written English. Many questions include a "NO CHANGE" option. Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage and supplementary material.Norman Borlaug and the Green RevolutionWorking in relative obscurity, (1) the efforts of one 20th century scientist may have saved nearly 1 billion lives. His name is Norman Borlaug, and he founded the scientific movement that we now call the Green Revolution. Borlaug received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 for his work around the world to develop and distribute high-yield varieties of wheat and rice, promote better agricultural management techniques, and (2) he modernized irrigation infrastructure. Largely as a result of Borlaugs work, (3) wheat yields throughout the world increased by over 200% between 1960 and 2014.(4) Born in 1914 on a farm in Cresco, Iowa, Borlaug came of age during the heart of the Depression. His grandfather convinced Norman to pursue an education, saying, “Youre wiser to fill your head now if you want to fill your belly later on.” Although he failed the entrance exam for the University of Minnesota, he did gain admittance to its two-year General College, and did well enough there to transfer to the College of Agricultures forestry program. (5) He became fascinated by work his professors were doing in breeding food crops to be resistant to parasitic (6) fungi. He decided to pursue research in plant pathology and breeding.Borlaugs professional work began in the 1940s, when he developed a high-yield and disease-resistant variety of wheat to help Mexican farmers become more productive. By 1963, most of the wheat crop in Mexico was grown from Borlaugs seeds, and the yield was600% greater than it had been in 1944. (7) Borlaugs work helped Mexico enormously in its effort to become more food secure, and even became a net exporter of wheat by 1963.His work went far beyond just handing out drought-resistant seeds to Mexican farmers.(8) Borlaug showed them how to better manage their productivity by taking advantage of Mexicos two growing seasons. He also showed them how to use genetic variations among crops in a single field to maximize disease resistance. Although some of the genetic strains might (9) succumb to the pathogens (disease-causing agents), those strains could easily be replaced with new, resistant lines, thereby maintaining higher crop yields.In the early 1960s, Borlaug traveled to two of the worlds most impoverished nations, India and Pakistan, to share his insights with government officials and farmers who were struggling with food shortages. The situation was so (10) dire as that the biologist Paul Ehrlich speculated in his 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb that “in the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Ehrlich singled out India for particular devastation because of its traditional and bureaucratic resistance to change.Fortunately, Borlaug kept working anyway. Between 1965 and 1970, Indias cereal crop yield increased by 63%, and by 1974, India was self-sufficient in the production of all cereals. For the last 50 years, food production in India and Pakistan has increased faster than the (11) population. This is due largely to the work of Norman Borlaug.Q.Which choice provides the most relevant and cohesive information?

Top Courses for SATView all

Top Courses for SAT

1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice 1 kilo liter in millilitersa)10,00,000b)1,00,000c)10,000d)1,000Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Top Courses for SAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup