GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, w...
Start Learning for Free
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
- a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.
- b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.
- c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.
- d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu options
- e)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always cent...
(A) Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.
This option provides positive feedback from customers who have tried the vegetarian sandwich, indicating that it has a high level of satisfaction among those who have actually tasted it. While this information is valuable, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich. It doesn't provide any insight into whether the satisfaction translates to increased sales or if the sandwich's low sales are due to other factors.
This option provides positive feedback from customers who have tried the vegetarian sandwich, indicating that it has a high level of satisfaction among those who have actually tasted it. While this information is valuable, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich. It doesn't provide any insight into whether the satisfaction translates to increased sales or if the sandwich's low sales are due to other factors.
(B) Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.
This option highlights that customers frequently dine at multiple fast-food chains and don't necessarily have a strong preference for one over the other. While this information may suggest that customers could easily switch to another chain if the vegetarian sandwich is dropped, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich.
This option highlights that customers frequently dine at multiple fast-food chains and don't necessarily have a strong preference for one over the other. While this information may suggest that customers could easily switch to another chain if the vegetarian sandwich is dropped, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich.
(C) Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.
This option provides a broader context regarding the overall trend in hamburger sales across fast-food chains. It suggests that the demand for hamburgers has stagnated due to increased competition from other types of food offerings. However, this information does not directly weaken the argument about the profitability of the vegetarian sandwich. It doesn't address the specific impact of dropping the sandwich on the chain's profitability.
This option provides a broader context regarding the overall trend in hamburger sales across fast-food chains. It suggests that the demand for hamburgers has stagnated due to increased competition from other types of food offerings. However, this information does not directly weaken the argument about the profitability of the vegetarian sandwich. It doesn't address the specific impact of dropping the sandwich on the chain's profitability.
(D) When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu options.
This option is the most relevant to the argument. It suggests that customers who have dietary preferences for vegetarian or low-fat options tend to avoid restaurants that don't offer such menu items. If the chain drops the vegetarian sandwich, it could potentially lose these customers, which could have a negative impact on profitability. This weakens the argument that dropping the sandwich would make the chain more profitable.
This option is the most relevant to the argument. It suggests that customers who have dietary preferences for vegetarian or low-fat options tend to avoid restaurants that don't offer such menu items. If the chain drops the vegetarian sandwich, it could potentially lose these customers, which could have a negative impact on profitability. This weakens the argument that dropping the sandwich would make the chain more profitable.
(E) An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.
This option provides information about a previous attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger, which failed to attract new customers. It also mentions that the regular hamburger was greatly preferred by the chain's regular customers. While this information suggests that introducing healthier options may not necessarily lead to increased sales, it doesn't directly address the profitability of dropping the current vegetarian sandwich. It pertains to a different menu item and doesn't provide insight into the potential impact of discontinuing the vegetarian sandwich on the chain's profitability.
This option provides information about a previous attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger, which failed to attract new customers. It also mentions that the regular hamburger was greatly preferred by the chain's regular customers. While this information suggests that introducing healthier options may not necessarily lead to increased sales, it doesn't directly address the profitability of dropping the current vegetarian sandwich. It pertains to a different menu item and doesn't provide insight into the potential impact of discontinuing the vegetarian sandwich on the chain's profitability.
In summary, option (D) weakens the argument by highlighting that dropping the vegetarian sandwich could result in the loss of customers with specific dietary preferences, potentially affecting the chain's profitability.
Most Upvoted Answer
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always cent...
(A) Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.
This option provides positive feedback from customers who have tried the vegetarian sandwich, indicating that it has a high level of satisfaction among those who have actually tasted it. While this information is valuable, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich. It doesn't provide any insight into whether the satisfaction translates to increased sales or if the sandwich's low sales are due to other factors.
This option provides positive feedback from customers who have tried the vegetarian sandwich, indicating that it has a high level of satisfaction among those who have actually tasted it. While this information is valuable, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich. It doesn't provide any insight into whether the satisfaction translates to increased sales or if the sandwich's low sales are due to other factors.
(B) Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.
This option highlights that customers frequently dine at multiple fast-food chains and don't necessarily have a strong preference for one over the other. While this information may suggest that customers could easily switch to another chain if the vegetarian sandwich is dropped, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich.
This option highlights that customers frequently dine at multiple fast-food chains and don't necessarily have a strong preference for one over the other. While this information may suggest that customers could easily switch to another chain if the vegetarian sandwich is dropped, it doesn't directly address the profitability of keeping or dropping the sandwich.
(C) Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.
This option provides a broader context regarding the overall trend in hamburger sales across fast-food chains. It suggests that the demand for hamburgers has stagnated due to increased competition from other types of food offerings. However, this information does not directly weaken the argument about the profitability of the vegetarian sandwich. It doesn't address the specific impact of dropping the sandwich on the chain's profitability.
This option provides a broader context regarding the overall trend in hamburger sales across fast-food chains. It suggests that the demand for hamburgers has stagnated due to increased competition from other types of food offerings. However, this information does not directly weaken the argument about the profitability of the vegetarian sandwich. It doesn't address the specific impact of dropping the sandwich on the chain's profitability.
(D) When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu options.
This option is the most relevant to the argument. It suggests that customers who have dietary preferences for vegetarian or low-fat options tend to avoid restaurants that don't offer such menu items. If the chain drops the vegetarian sandwich, it could potentially lose these customers, which could have a negative impact on profitability. This weakens the argument that dropping the sandwich would make the chain more profitable.
This option is the most relevant to the argument. It suggests that customers who have dietary preferences for vegetarian or low-fat options tend to avoid restaurants that don't offer such menu items. If the chain drops the vegetarian sandwich, it could potentially lose these customers, which could have a negative impact on profitability. This weakens the argument that dropping the sandwich would make the chain more profitable.
(E) An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.
This option provides information about a previous attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger, which failed to attract new customers. It also mentions that the regular hamburger was greatly preferred by the chain's regular customers. While this information suggests that introducing healthier options may not necessarily lead to increased sales, it doesn't directly address the profitability of dropping the current vegetarian sandwich. It pertains to a different menu item and doesn't provide insight into the potential impact of discontinuing the vegetarian sandwich on the chain's profitability.
This option provides information about a previous attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger, which failed to attract new customers. It also mentions that the regular hamburger was greatly preferred by the chain's regular customers. While this information suggests that introducing healthier options may not necessarily lead to increased sales, it doesn't directly address the profitability of dropping the current vegetarian sandwich. It pertains to a different menu item and doesn't provide insight into the potential impact of discontinuing the vegetarian sandwich on the chain's profitability.
In summary, option (D) weakens the argument by highlighting that dropping the vegetarian sandwich could result in the loss of customers with specific dietary preferences, potentially affecting the chain's profitability.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Last year a chain of fast-food restaurants, whose menu had always centered on hamburger, added its first vegetarian sandwich, much lower in fat than the chain’s other offerings. Despite heavy marketing, the new sandwich accounts for a very small proportion of the chain’s sales. The sandwich’s sales would have to quadruple to cover the costs associated with including it on the menu. Since such an increase is unlikely, the chain would be more profitable if it dropped the sandwich.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)Although many of the chain’s customers have never tried the vegetarian sandwich, in a market research survey most of those who had tried it reported that they were very satisfied with it.b)Many of the people who eat at the chain’s restaurants also eat at the restaurants of competing chains and report no strong preference among the competitors.c)Among fast-food chains in general, there has been little or no growth in hamburger sales over the past several years as the range of competing offerings at other restaurants has grown.d)When even one member of a group of diners is a vegetarian or has a preference for low-fat food, the group tends to avoid restaurants that lack vegetarian or low-fat menu optionse)An attempt by the chain to introduce a lower-fat hamburger failed several years ago, since it attracted few new customers and most of the chain’s regular customers greatly preferred the taste of the regular hamburger.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup