GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > For the average person who needs a transfusio...
Start Learning for Free
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
- a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.
- b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.
- c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.
- d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.
- e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative ...
Understanding the Argument
The argument suggests that blood from relatives carries a higher risk of hepatitis infection compared to blood from blood banks. Therefore, it concludes that individuals receiving transfusions from relatives face a greater risk of contracting hepatitis.
Key Points of the Argument
- Blood from relatives is more likely to be infected with hepatitis.
- Blood bank donations are considered safer.
- The conclusion implies a higher risk for transfusions from family members.
Why Option E Weakens the Argument
Option E states that "Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis." This information significantly impacts the argument in the following ways:
- Screening Reduces Risk: If all blood intended for transfusions is screened, then the risk of hepatitis infection is mitigated, regardless of the source (relative or blood bank). This undermines the assertion that blood from relatives is inherently more dangerous.
- Equalizing Risk Factors: The screening process means that both blood types are subjected to the same safety protocols, thus reducing the overall risk of infection from both sources.
- Shifts Focus from Source to Process: The argument fails to consider that the method of blood collection and processing (screening) is crucial in determining safety, not just the source of the blood.
In conclusion, by highlighting the universal screening of transfusion blood, option E effectively challenges the basis of the argument, demonstrating that the risk of hepatitis is not necessarily higher for blood from relatives compared to blood from banks.
The argument suggests that blood from relatives carries a higher risk of hepatitis infection compared to blood from blood banks. Therefore, it concludes that individuals receiving transfusions from relatives face a greater risk of contracting hepatitis.
Key Points of the Argument
- Blood from relatives is more likely to be infected with hepatitis.
- Blood bank donations are considered safer.
- The conclusion implies a higher risk for transfusions from family members.
Why Option E Weakens the Argument
Option E states that "Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis." This information significantly impacts the argument in the following ways:
- Screening Reduces Risk: If all blood intended for transfusions is screened, then the risk of hepatitis infection is mitigated, regardless of the source (relative or blood bank). This undermines the assertion that blood from relatives is inherently more dangerous.
- Equalizing Risk Factors: The screening process means that both blood types are subjected to the same safety protocols, thus reducing the overall risk of infection from both sources.
- Shifts Focus from Source to Process: The argument fails to consider that the method of blood collection and processing (screening) is crucial in determining safety, not just the source of the blood.
In conclusion, by highlighting the universal screening of transfusion blood, option E effectively challenges the basis of the argument, demonstrating that the risk of hepatitis is not necessarily higher for blood from relatives compared to blood from banks.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative ...
(A) People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.
This option does not weaken the argument. If people frequently request blood from their relatives, it supports the premise that blood from relatives is more likely to be used in transfusions.
This option does not weaken the argument. If people frequently request blood from their relatives, it supports the premise that blood from relatives is more likely to be used in transfusions.
(B) Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.
This option weakens the argument by challenging the premise that blood from relatives is more likely to be infected with hepatitis. If blood transfusions rarely result in hepatitis transmission regardless of the source, it undermines the idea that blood from relatives poses a higher risk.
This option weakens the argument by challenging the premise that blood from relatives is more likely to be infected with hepatitis. If blood transfusions rarely result in hepatitis transmission regardless of the source, it undermines the idea that blood from relatives poses a higher risk.
(C) Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient's blood type.
This option does not weaken the argument. While it provides information about blood type matching, it does not address the issue of hepatitis infection, which is the focus of the argument.
This option does not weaken the argument. While it provides information about blood type matching, it does not address the issue of hepatitis infection, which is the focus of the argument.
(D) Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.
This option does not weaken the argument. Asking blood donors about hepatitis infection helps ensure the safety of blood donations but does not directly address the comparison between blood from relatives and blood from blood banks.
This option does not weaken the argument. Asking blood donors about hepatitis infection helps ensure the safety of blood donations but does not directly address the comparison between blood from relatives and blood from blood banks.
(E) Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.
This option weakens the argument by presenting a safety measure that applies to all blood used in transfusions, regardless of the source. If all blood used in transfusions is screened for hepatitis, it suggests that the risk of contracting hepatitis is mitigated, regardless of whether the blood comes from relatives or blood banks.
This option weakens the argument by presenting a safety measure that applies to all blood used in transfusions, regardless of the source. If all blood used in transfusions is screened for hepatitis, it suggests that the risk of contracting hepatitis is mitigated, regardless of whether the blood comes from relatives or blood banks.
Therefore, option (E) most seriously weakens the argument by highlighting that all blood used in transfusions is screened for hepatitis, reducing the risk of infection regardless of the source.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice For the average person who needs a transfusion, blood from a relative is more likely to be infected with hepatitis than is blood from a blood bank. Therefore, the risk of contracting hepatitis from a transfusion is higher for people receiving blood from relatives than for people receiving blood from blood banks.Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?a)People receiving blood transfusions often specify that blood from their relatives be used.b)Blood transfusions only rarely result in the recipient being infected with hepatitis.c)Blood taken from a relative is highly likely to match a transfusion recipient’s blood type.d)Donors to blood banks are always asked whether they have ever been infected with hepatitis.e)Blood that is to be used in a transfusion is always screened for hepatitis.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup