GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Rose...
Start Learning for Free
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.
Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?
- a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.
- b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.
- c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.
- d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.
- e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would h...
(A) A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.
This option directly supports Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides evidence that from 1984 to 1992, the city incurred significant expenses to rent extra office space due to the shortage of courtroom space. If the courthouse had been built in 1982, as the Mayor proposed, the need for renting additional office space and the associated expenses would have been eliminated, resulting in cost savings for the city.
This option directly supports Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides evidence that from 1984 to 1992, the city incurred significant expenses to rent extra office space due to the shortage of courtroom space. If the courthouse had been built in 1982, as the Mayor proposed, the need for renting additional office space and the associated expenses would have been eliminated, resulting in cost savings for the city.
(B) Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982, the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about the number of court cases in 1992 and 1982, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about the number of court cases in 1992 and 1982, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
(C) There was more opposition to the mayor's proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.
This option does not support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about the level of opposition to the courthouse proposals in 1982 and 1992 but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings associated with the delay.
This option does not support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about the level of opposition to the courthouse proposals in 1982 and 1992 but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings associated with the delay.
(D) In 1980, Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about Councillor Simón's past support for a more expensive courthouse proposal, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about Councillor Simón's past support for a more expensive courthouse proposal, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
(E) In 1987, a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about a judge resigning in protest against crowded prison conditions but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about a judge resigning in protest against crowded prison conditions but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
In summary, option (A) is the statement that most strongly supports Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It directly supports the cost-saving aspect of the delay by highlighting the substantial expenses incurred by the city to rent additional office space during the shortage of courtroom space. The other options either provide unrelated information or do not directly support the conclusion about cost savings.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup