All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Rose... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.
Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?
  • a)
    A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.
  • b)
    Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.
  • c)
    There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.
  • d)
    In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.
  • e)
    In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would h...
(A) A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.
This option directly supports Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides evidence that from 1984 to 1992, the city incurred significant expenses to rent extra office space due to the shortage of courtroom space. If the courthouse had been built in 1982, as the Mayor proposed, the need for renting additional office space and the associated expenses would have been eliminated, resulting in cost savings for the city.
(B) Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982, the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about the number of court cases in 1992 and 1982, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
(C) There was more opposition to the mayor's proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.
This option does not support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about the level of opposition to the courthouse proposals in 1982 and 1992 but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings associated with the delay.
(D) In 1980, Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. While it provides information about Councillor Simón's past support for a more expensive courthouse proposal, it does not address the financial implications or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
(E) In 1987, a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.
This option does not directly support Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It provides information about a judge resigning in protest against crowded prison conditions but does not address the financial aspects or cost savings related to the delay in building the courthouse.
In summary, option (A) is the statement that most strongly supports Mayor Tyler's conclusion. It directly supports the cost-saving aspect of the delay by highlighting the substantial expenses incurred by the city to rent additional office space during the shortage of courtroom space. The other options either provide unrelated information or do not directly support the conclusion about cost savings.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Although websites such as Facebook and MySpace experienced exponential growth during the middle of the first decade of the 21st century, some users remain oblivious to the fact that the information they post online can come back to haunt them. First, employers can monitor employees who maintain a blog, photo diary, or website. Employers can look for controversial employee opinions, sensitive information disclosures, or wildly inappropriate conduct. For example, a North Carolina newspaper fired one of its features writers after she created a blog on which she anonymously wrote about the idiosyncrasies of her job and coworkers.The second unintended use of information from social networking websites is employers who check on prospective employees. A June 11, 2006 New York Times article reported that many companies recruiting on college campuses use search engines and social networking websites such as MySpace, Xanga, and Facebook to conduct background checks. Although the use of MySpace or Google to scrutinize a student’s background is somewhat unsettling to many undergraduates, the Times noted that the utilization of Facebook is especially shocking to students who believe that Facebook is limited to current students and recent alumni.Corporate recruiters and prospective employers are not the only people interested in college students’ lives. The third unintended use of social networking websites is college administrators who monitor the Internet—especially Facebook—for student misconduct. For example, a college in Boston’s Back Bay expelled its student Government Association President for joining a Facebook group highly critical of a campus police sergeant. In addition, fifteen students at a state university in North Carolina faced charges in court for underage drinking because of photos that appeared on Facebook.Although more users of websites such as Facebook are becoming aware of the potential pitfalls of online identities, many regular users still fail to take three basic security precautions. First, only make your information available to a specific list of individuals whom you approve. Second, regularly search for potentially harmful information about yourself that may have been posted by mistake or by a disgruntled former associate. Third, never post blatantly offensive material under your name or on your page as, despite the best precautions, this material will likely make its way to the wider world. By taking these simple steps, members of the digital world can realize the many benefits of e-community without experiencing some of the damaging unintended consequences.Q.Based upon the passage, the author implies which of the following

Read the passage and answer the question given below.The author ofThe Affluent Societyargued throughout his long and distinguished career for a better balance in advanced capitalist societies between private affluence and the evident public poverty. By public poverty he meant the impoverished disenfranchised citizens, but also the poor infrastructure such as inadequate roads, state school provision and the lack of state intervention to preserve the environment against the excesses of industry. The affluent society was to be achieved through measures (more active government, welfare programs, state planning and most controversially, the redistribution of wealth through taxation), which were very much out of favor during the brief period when monetarism dominated both politics and economics. Of course, Galbraith had been making the case for these policies long before monetarism and he continued to do so long after its demise; a demise that he most certainly hastened with his profound yet witty criticism of that ideology. For a European it is hard to understand why he did not embrace socialism, but he always advocated the mixed economy. Politically and as an adopted American he was a Democrat. Intellectually he was a lifelong disciple of Keynes and greatly influenced by the post-war American New Deal.Q. Which of the following statements best expresses the primary objective of the passage?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Mayor Tyler: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost $26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to $30 million to build. If the courthouse had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding we were experiencing, Roseville would have saved at least $4 million by now.Councillor Simón: Your own financial reports inform us that $26 million in 1982 dollars is equivalent to $37 million in 1992 dollars. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an underutilized courthouse for ten years, we can only view the delay as a financial boon for Roseville.Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports Mayor Tyler’s conclusion?a)A shortage of courtroom space was not experienced until 1990, but from 1984 to 1992 the city spent a substantial amount of money each year to rent extra office space that the new courthouse would have provided.b)Roseville had substantially fewer court cases in 1992 than in 1982, but in 1982 the number of court cases was exceptionally large because of challenges to a controversial law passed in 1981 and repealed in 1982.c)There was more opposition to the mayor’s proposal in 1982 to build a new courthouse than to the proposal in 1992 for the courthouse to be built.d)In 1980 Councillor Simón supported a proposal to build a courthouse that would have cost substantially more than $26 million.e)In 1987 a prominent judge resigned from office in protest against crowded prison conditions in the Roseville district.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup