Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of andldquo;benefit.andrdquo;e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Observatory director: Some say that funding t...

Join the Discussion on the App

Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.

If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?

a)
It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
b)
It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
c)
It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
d)
It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”
e)
It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Weaken Argument

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will ben...

Let's analyze each option:

(A) It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in the construction of the megatelescope.
This criticism suggests that the argument relies too heavily on the expertise of astronomers without considering the potential limitations or drawbacks of building the megatelescope. However, the argument itself doesn't explicitly appeal to the authority of experts, so this criticism is not the strongest.

(B) It does not identify those opposed to the development of the megatelescope.
This criticism points out that the argument fails to acknowledge the existence or perspectives of individuals who are against the development of the megatelescope. While it is a valid point, it is not the strongest criticism of the argument.

(C) It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
This criticism argues that the argument resorts to personal attacks rather than engaging with the opposing viewpoints in a constructive manner. However, there is no personal attack in the argument, so this criticism is not the strongest.

(D) It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of "benefit."
This criticism suggests that the argument fails to clarify whether the benefit mentioned refers to economic gains or intellectual advancement. While it highlights a potential ambiguity, it does not directly undermine the argument's reasoning.

(E) It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
This criticism is the strongest because it challenges the core of the argument's reasoning. The argument draws a parallel between the potential benefits of the megatelescope and the groundbreaking research of Maxwell, Newton, and Einstein. However, it fails to establish that the megatelescope research possesses a similar level of potential for applications. Therefore, option (E) is the strongest criticism.

In summary, the strongest criticism of the argument is (E) It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The progress of astronomy has always been closely associated with the development and application of mechanical processes and skill. Before the seventeenth century, the size of the planets could not be measured, the satellites of the planets except the Earths moon were unknown, the phases of Mercury and Venus were merely conjectured, and accurate positions of the sun, moon, and planets among the stars, and of the stars among themselves, were impossible all because there were no telescopes. More than a half century elapsed after the invention of the telescope before Picard combined it with a graduated circle in such a way that the measurement of angles was greatly improved. Then arose the necessity for accurate time. Although Galileo had learned the principles governing the pendulum, astronomy had to wait for the mechanical genius of Huygens before a satisfactory clock was invented around 1657.Nearly all the large reflecting telescopes ever built were constructed by astronomers who possessed great facility in practical mechanics. The rapid and significant advances in nearly all departments of astronomy in the past century would not have been possible except through the skill and patience of glassmakers, opticians, and engineers. The principles of spectrum analysis as formulated by Kirchho allowed for the discovery of the elements composing every heavenly body. The deftness of Wollaston showed that light could not be analyzed unless it first passed through a very narrow slit. Even in our modern day the power of the telescope and spectroscope has been vastly extended by the optical skill and mechanical dexterity of individuals such as Rowland, Hastings and Brashear, all Americans.An observatory site should have a fairly unobstructed horizon, as much freedom from cloud as possible, good foundations for the instruments, and a very steady atmosphere. To understand the necessity of a steady atmosphere, look at some distant outdoor object through a window on a hot summer day. The object appears blurry and wavering. Similarly, currents of warm air continually rise from the earth to upper regions of the atmosphere, and colder air comes down and rushes underneath. Although these atmospheric movements are often invisible to the eye, their effect is plainly visible in the telescope as a blurry distortion. In order for an ideally-designed telescope to perform perfectly, it must be located in a perfect atmosphere. Otherwise its full power cannot be employed. All hindrances of atmosphere are most advantageously avoided in arid or desert regions of the globe, at elevations of 3000 to 10,000 feet above sea level. Higher mountains have as yet been only partially investigated, and it is not known whether difficulties of occupying them permanently would more than counterbalance the gain which greater elevation would afford.It can be inferred from the passage that

View answer

New observations about the age of some globular clusters in our Milky Way galaxy have cast doubt on a long-held theory about how the galaxy was formed. The Milky Way contains about 125 globular clusters (compact groups of anywhere from several tens of thousands to perhaps a million stars) distributed in a roughly spherical halo around the galactic nucleus. The stars in these clusters are believed to have been born during the formation of the galaxy, and so may be considered relics of the original galactic nebula, holding vital clues to the way the formation took place.The conventional theory of the formation of the galaxy contends that roughly 12 to 13 billion years ago the Milky Way formed over a relatively short time (about 200 million years) when a spherical cloud of gas collapsed under the pressure of its own gravity into a disc surrounded by a halo. Such a rapid formation of the galaxy would mean that all stars in the halo should be very nearly the same age.However, the astronomer Michael Bolte has found considerable variation in the ages of globular clusters. One of the clusters studied by Bolte is 2 billions years older than most other clusters in the galaxy, while another is 2 billion years younger. A colleague of Bolte contends that the cluster called Palomar 12 is 5 billion years younger than most other globular clusters.To explain the age differences among the globular clusters, astronomers are taking a second look at “renegade” theories. One such newly fashionable theory, first put forward by Richard Larson in the early 1970’s, argues that the halo of the Milky Way formed over a period of a billion or more years as hundreds of small gas clouds drifted about, collided, lost orbital energy, and finally collapsed into a centrally condensed elliptical system. Larson’s conception of a “lumpy and turbulent” protogalaxy is complemented by computer modeling done in the 1970’s by mathematician Alan Toomre, which suggests that closely interacting spiral galaxies could lose enough orbital energy to merge into a single galaxy.The passage is primarily concerned with discussing

View answer

Which of the following best completes the passage below?An Entertainment industry spokespersons statement that the industry loses millions of dollars every year due to illegal downloads of mobile applications. Yet, this claim is not representative of the truth. Most people who illegally download mobile applications without paying for them are those that have no serious interest in that application. Thus, the loss to the industry is quite small, because......

View answer

To complete buildings that are similar in size, design, and complexity, construction companies working in Zone A usually take longer than those in Zone B. The equipment used by construction companies in Zone A is more sophisticated than that available to such companies operating in Zone B. It can be said that construction companies in Zone A are far less proficient than those operating in Zone B.To evaluate the argument, it would be most useful to form a comparison between

View answer

The city of Montreal spends a large portion of its annual budget on the constructionof tourist attractions such as amusement parks, even if it is by no means certainthat the construction of tourist attractions increases revenue from tourism.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Observatory director: Some say that funding the megatelescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have stifled their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the megatelescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?a)It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.b)It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.c)It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.d)It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual sense of “benefit.”e)It does not show that the proposed megatelescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam