GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled ... Start Learning for Free
Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.
Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?
  • a)
    Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.
  • b)
    Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.
  • c)
    Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.
  • d)
    The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.
  • e)
    The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, ye...
A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.
This option suggests that there was a significant increase in the number of bus stops during the given period. However, while this information may affect factors such as accessibility and convenience for passengers, it does not directly explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Therefore, it does not provide a clear explanation for the discrepancy.
B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.
This option indicates that there was a notable increase in the total distance covered by the average bus trip during the specified period. While this information might impact factors such as travel time and route planning, it does not directly address why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Thus, it does not provide a resolution to the discrepancy.
C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.
This option explains that the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make connections en route to their final destinations significantly increased during the given period. Since each connection would count as a new boarding, this would contribute to the higher increase in boardings compared to the increase in the actual number of bus trips. Therefore, option (C) provides the most relevant explanation for the given discrepancy.
D) The proportion of business travelers using buses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.
This option suggests that there was a notable increase in the proportion of business travelers using buses compared to pleasure travelers during the specified period. However, while this information may shed light on the demographics of bus passengers, it does not directly address why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Hence, it does not resolve the discrepancy effectively.
E) The average seating capacity of buses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.
This option indicates that the average seating capacity of buses experienced a significant increase during the given period. While this may impact factors such as passenger comfort and availability of seats, it does not directly explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Therefore, it does not provide a clear resolution to the discrepancy.
In summary, option (C) is the most relevant and provides the best explanation for the given discrepancy, as it directly addresses the increase in boardings due to the higher proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make connections en route to their final destinations.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, ye...
A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.
This option suggests that there was a significant increase in the number of bus stops during the given period. However, while this information may affect factors such as accessibility and convenience for passengers, it does not directly explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Therefore, it does not provide a clear explanation for the discrepancy.
B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.
This option indicates that there was a notable increase in the total distance covered by the average bus trip during the specified period. While this information might impact factors such as travel time and route planning, it does not directly address why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Thus, it does not provide a resolution to the discrepancy.
C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.
This option explains that the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make connections en route to their final destinations significantly increased during the given period. Since each connection would count as a new boarding, this would contribute to the higher increase in boardings compared to the increase in the actual number of bus trips. Therefore, option (C) provides the most relevant explanation for the given discrepancy.
D) The proportion of business travelers using buses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.
This option suggests that there was a notable increase in the proportion of business travelers using buses compared to pleasure travelers during the specified period. However, while this information may shed light on the demographics of bus passengers, it does not directly address why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Hence, it does not resolve the discrepancy effectively.
E) The average seating capacity of buses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.
This option indicates that the average seating capacity of buses experienced a significant increase during the given period. While this may impact factors such as passenger comfort and availability of seats, it does not directly explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips. Therefore, it does not provide a clear resolution to the discrepancy.
In summary, option (C) is the most relevant and provides the best explanation for the given discrepancy, as it directly addresses the increase in boardings due to the higher proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make connections en route to their final destinations.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.According to the passage, Sommerer and Ott’s model differs from a riddled basin of attraction in which one of the following ways?

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.Given the information in the passage, Sommerer and Ott are most likely to agree with which one of the following?

Top Courses for GMAT

Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?a)Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.b)Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.c)Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.d)The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.e)The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev