GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Parent: Pushing very young children into rigo... Start Learning for Free
Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?
  • a)
    For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.
  • b)
    The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.
  • c)
    Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.
  • d)
    A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.
  • e)
    Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort t...
(D) A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.
The parent argues against pushing very young children into rigorous study, stating that it does more harm than good and that curricula for these young students should address their special developmental needs. The parent also mentions that rigorous work in secondary school makes sense but not in the early years of primary school, as it may cause burnout.
From these statements, we can infer that the parent believes a curriculum of rigorous study is not suitable for primary school students. The emphasis is on the inadequacy of such an approach in addressing the developmental needs of young children.
Option (A) cannot be inferred because the parent's statements focus on the early years of primary school, not secondary school.
Option (B) is not mentioned in the parent's statements. The focus is on the developmental needs of young children, not secondary school students.
Option (C) is not directly addressed in the parent's statements. While the parent argues for addressing the developmental needs of all students, it does not explicitly state that the competitiveness of the country depends on meeting those needs.
Option (D) aligns with the parent's statements. The parent argues against a rigorous curriculum in the early years of primary school, suggesting that it does not adequately address the developmental needs of young children.
Option (E) cannot be inferred from the parent's statements. The focus is on the potential harm of rigorous study in the early years of primary school, but the economic competitiveness of the nation is not explicitly linked to it.
Therefore, the most accurate inference that can be drawn from the parent's statements is (D) A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Parent: Pushing very young children into rigorous study in an effort to make our nation more competitive does more harm than good. Curricula for these young students must address their special developmental needs, and while rigorous work in secondary school makes sense, the same approach in the early years of primary school produces only short-term gains and may cause young children to burn out on schoolwork. Using very young students as pawns in the race to make the nation economically competitive is unfair and may ultimately work against us.Which one of the following can be inferred from the parent’s statements?a)For our nation to be competitive, our secondary school curriculum must include more rigorous study than it now does.b)The developmental needs of secondary school students are not now being addressed in our high schools.c)Our country can be competitive only if the developmental needs of all our students can be met.d)A curriculum of rigorous study does not adequately address the developmental needs of primary school students.e)Unless our nation encourages more rigorous study in the early years of primary school, we cannot be economically competitive.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev