All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Political scientist: Efforts to create a more... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.
The political scientist’s argument proceeds by
  • a)
    undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequences
  • b)
    rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be based
  • c)
    attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interest
  • d)
    claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the group
  • e)
    undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claim
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are ...
(A) undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequences:
This option suggests that the argument undermines a view by demonstrating that if the view were widely accepted, it would result in negative outcomes. However, the argument does not present an undesirable consequence of accepting the opposing view. Instead, it challenges the assumption that equality would lead to uniformity and blandness.
(B) rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be based:
This option aligns closely with the reasoning in the passage. The argument addresses an objection raised against efforts to create a more egalitarian society by attacking the assumption that equality necessitates uniformity. It counters this assumption by arguing that promoting complementary human interests can enhance diversity and achieve greater equality.
(C) attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interest:
This option suggests that the argument attacks a view by asserting that its proponents are motivated solely by self-interest. However, the passage does not make any claims about the motivations of those who hold the opposing view. It focuses on challenging the assumption about equality and uniformity.
(D) claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the group:
This option suggests that the argument asserts that whatever is true of a group applies to each individual within that group. However, the passage does not make a claim about group characteristics or generalize from a group to its individual members. It primarily focuses on challenging the assumption about equality and diversity.
(E) undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claim:
This option suggests that the argument undermines a counterexample that challenges a universal claim. However, the passage does not present a counterexample or engage in discussions of universal claims. It primarily addresses an objection and challenges the assumption about equality and uniformity.
Based on the explanations above, option (B) is the most accurate representation of the political scientist's argument in the passage.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

One often hears that biographies are autobiographies, that the biographer is always writing about himself. On the contrary, serious biographers seek and welcome the unfamiliar, however troublesome to account for. Ron Chernow, the author of rich biographies of the American businessmen J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, remarks that biographers “like to stub their toes on hard, uncomfortable facts strewn in their paths.” Such encounters with the unaccountable are opportunities for breaking out and breaking through, in new directions, to fresh understanding.One also often hears that biographers must like their subjects. That would of course rule out such vastly important subjects as Hitler or Stalin. In practice, the biographer must like the subject not as a person but as a subject. Some are good subjects for the author, some bad. And what makes one subject better than another for any particular biographer varies dramatically. Some of the reasons are purely practical. Does the subject need a biography? Are the materials available? How much time is needed? A biographer’s knowledge and ability also determine the choice. Great scientists are great subjects, but can one write about their achievements with insight and authority? Personal idiosyncrasies matter, too.Biographers tend to be attracted to subjects who display particular personality traits, whether they be ambition, cruelty, ingenuity, or any other characteristic that separates a potential subject from the multitudes.In choosing a subject, the biographer’s main question should be, “Can an effective book be made out of this person’s life?” Day after day for years, the biographer will try to untangle chronology, compress relationships without distorting them, and keep the main narrative clear while carrying forward several intricate strands of the subject’s life. What pushes most biographers on in this endeavor is not necessarily affection for the subject but the feeling that they are writing a good book.Q.The author mentions Ron Chernow most probably in order to

For millennia, the Nile River flooded nearly every year as a natural consequence of heavy summer rains on the Ethiopian Plateau; in the last century, as the population in the region exploded, the cycle of flooding interspersed with periodic drought caused widespread suffering for the local population. In the mid-1950s, the Egyptian government concluded that a significant dam was necessary to enable the country’s economic development to be on a par with that of Western nations. The Aswan Dam would prevent the annual flooding, generate hydroelectric power and supply a steady source of water for residents and agricultural activities, though it would also have other, less positive effects.By the 1970s, most Egyptian villages had electric power, and the dam provided approximately half of Egypt’s entire output of electricity. The benefits were counteracted, however, by consequences which were sometimes slow to appear but ruinous in their long-term effects. Dams prevent silt from flowing through to downstream lands.The silt is essential for renewing the minerals and nutrients that make the land fertile; before the dam, the Nile floodplain was famously productive. Farmers have had to substitute artificial fertilizers, reducing profits and causing pervasive chemical pollution with deleterious effects for the human, animal and plant populations living near or in the river. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions about a project with such substantial and varied results, but it would be untenable to assert that the Egyptian government should never have built the Aswan Dam.Q.Based upon the content of the passage, the author would most likely agree with which of the following propositions?

For millennia, the Nile River flooded nearly every year as a natural consequence of heavy summer rains on the Ethiopian Plateau; in the last century, as the population in the region exploded, the cycle of flooding interspersed with periodic drought caused widespread suffering for the local population. In the mid-1950s, the Egyptian government concluded that a significant dam was necessary to enable the country’s economic development to be on a par with that of Western nations. The Aswan Dam would prevent the annual flooding, generate hydroelectric power and supply a steady source of water for residents and agricultural activities, though it would also have other, less positive effects.By the 1970s, most Egyptian villages had electric power, and the dam provided approximately half of Egypt’s entire output of electricity. The benefits were counteracted, however, by consequences which were sometimes slow to appear but ruinous in their long-term effects. Dams prevent silt from flowing through to downstream lands.The silt is essential for renewing the minerals and nutrients that make the land fertile; before the dam, the Nile floodplain was famously productive. Farmers have had to substitute artificial fertilizers, reducing profits and causing pervasive chemical pollution with deleterious effects for the human, animal and plant populations living near or in the river. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions about a project with such substantial and varied results, but it would be untenable to assert that the Egyptian government should never have built the Aswan Dam.Q.All of the following are mentioned as benefits of the Aswan Dam EXCEPT

For millennia, the Nile River flooded nearly every year as a natural consequence of heavy summer rains on the Ethiopian Plateau; in the last century, as the population in the region exploded, the cycle of flooding interspersed with periodic drought caused widespread suffering for the local population. In the mid-1950s, the Egyptian government concluded that a significant dam was necessary to enable the country’s economic development to be on a par with that of Western nations. The Aswan Dam would prevent the annual flooding, generate hydroelectric power and supply a steady source of water for residents and agricultural activities, though it would also have other, less positive effects.By the 1970s, most Egyptian villages had electric power, and the dam provided approximately half of Egypt’s entire output of electricity. The benefits were counteracted, however, by consequences which were sometimes slow to appear but ruinous in their long-term effects. Dams prevent silt from flowing through to downstream lands.The silt is essential for renewing the minerals and nutrients that make the land fertile; before the dam, the Nile floodplain was famously productive. Farmers have had to substitute artificial fertilizers, reducing profits and causing pervasive chemical pollution with deleterious effects for the human, animal and plant populations living near or in the river. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions about a project with such substantial and varied results, but it would be untenable to assert that the Egyptian government should never have built the Aswan Dam.Q.What is the primary purpose of the passage?

For millennia, the Nile River flooded nearly every year as a natural consequence of heavy summer rains on the Ethiopian Plateau; in the last century, as the population in the region exploded, the cycle of flooding interspersed with periodic drought caused widespread suffering for the local population. In the mid-1950s, the Egyptian government concluded that a significant dam was necessary to enable the country’s economic development to be on a par with that of Western nations. The Aswan Dam would prevent the annual flooding, generate hydroelectric power and supply a steady source of water for residents and agricultural activities, though it would also have other, less positive effects.By the 1970s, most Egyptian villages had electric power, and the dam provided approximately half of Egypt’s entire output of electricity. The benefits were counteracted, however, by consequences which were sometimes slow to appear but ruinous in their long-term effects. Dams prevent silt from flowing through to downstream lands.The silt is essential for renewing the minerals and nutrients that make the land fertile; before the dam, the Nile floodplain was famously productive. Farmers have had to substitute artificial fertilizers, reducing profits and causing pervasive chemical pollution with deleterious effects for the human, animal and plant populations living near or in the river. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions about a project with such substantial and varied results, but it would be untenable to assert that the Egyptian government should never have built the Aswan Dam.Q.TCrops cannot grow without silt.he passage implies which of the following about the effects of the Aswan Dam?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total equality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold. Equality is presumed by such critics to require unacceptably bland uniformity. But this is not so. By promoting complementary human interests, a society can achieve a greater and more prosperous equality while enhancing rather than minimizing diversity.The political scientist’s argument proceeds bya)undermining a view by showing that its general acceptance would lead to undesirable consequencesb)rebutting an objection by attacking the assumption on which it is said to be basedc)attacking a view by claiming that those who propose it are motivated only by self-interestd)claiming that whatever is true of a group must be true of each of the members of the groupe)undermining an apparent counterexample to a universal claimCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup