GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite S...
Start Learning for Free
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.
The author of the passage criticizes the editorial by
- a)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorial
- b)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorial
- c)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editorial
- d)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been based
- e)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorial
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrict...
(A) disputing certain factual claims made in the editorial:
This option suggests that the author of the passage disagrees with specific factual claims made in the editorial. However, the passage does not directly dispute any specific factual claims. Instead, it focuses on pointing out an inconsistency in the editorial's stance on academic freedom.
This option suggests that the author of the passage disagrees with specific factual claims made in the editorial. However, the passage does not directly dispute any specific factual claims. Instead, it focuses on pointing out an inconsistency in the editorial's stance on academic freedom.
(B) pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorial:
This option aligns closely with the reasoning in the passage. The author highlights the inconsistency in the editorial's position on academic freedom in the United States versus the Soviet Union. By contrasting the defense of restrictions on academic freedom in the United States while criticizing the Soviet government's stance, the author points out the apparent inconsistency in the editorial.
This option aligns closely with the reasoning in the passage. The author highlights the inconsistency in the editorial's position on academic freedom in the United States versus the Soviet Union. By contrasting the defense of restrictions on academic freedom in the United States while criticizing the Soviet government's stance, the author points out the apparent inconsistency in the editorial.
(C) describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editorial:
This option suggests that the author describes an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editorial. However, the passage does not present an alleged exception to a general claim. Instead, it focuses on the inconsistency between the editorial's positions on academic freedom in the United States and the Soviet Union.
This option suggests that the author describes an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editorial. However, the passage does not present an alleged exception to a general claim. Instead, it focuses on the inconsistency between the editorial's positions on academic freedom in the United States and the Soviet Union.
(D) refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been based:
This option suggests that the author refutes an assumption underlying the argument made in the editorial. However, the passage does not explicitly refute an assumption made in the editorial. It primarily criticizes the inconsistency between the editorial's positions rather than directly challenging the assumptions behind the argument.
This option suggests that the author refutes an assumption underlying the argument made in the editorial. However, the passage does not explicitly refute an assumption made in the editorial. It primarily criticizes the inconsistency between the editorial's positions rather than directly challenging the assumptions behind the argument.
(E) drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorial:
This option suggests that the author draws different conclusions from the editorial than those drawn by the writer of the editorial. While the passage does provide a critical assessment of the editorial, it does not explicitly present different conclusions. Instead, it highlights the inconsistency in the editorial's stance on academic freedom.
This option suggests that the author draws different conclusions from the editorial than those drawn by the writer of the editorial. While the passage does provide a critical assessment of the editorial, it does not explicitly present different conclusions. Instead, it highlights the inconsistency in the editorial's stance on academic freedom.
Based on the explanations above, option (B) is the most accurate representation of how the author criticizes the editorial in the passage.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup