Question Description
Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Some years ago, an editorial defended Unite States government restrictions on academic freedom, arguing that scientists who receive public funding cannot rightly “detach themselves from the government’s policies on national security.” Yet the same editorial criticized the Soviet government for not allowing scientists to “detach themselves from politics.” If there is a significant difference between the principles involved in each case, the editorial should have explained what that difference is.The author of the passage criticizes the editorial bya)disputing certain factual claims made in the editorialb)pointing out an apparent inconsistency in the editorialc)describing an alleged exception to a general claim made in the editoriald)refuting an assumption on which the argument of the editorial appears to have been basede)drawing conclusions from the editorial different from the conclusion drawn by the writer of the editorialCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.