GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Political scientist: One of the most interest...
Start Learning for Free
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.
Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?
- a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public office
- b)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warranted
- c)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warranted
- d)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaigns
- e)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spend
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contempor...
A. Only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public office: This option suggests that only candidates who have substantial campaign resources should be allowed to run for public office. However, this solution does not address the dilemma raised in the argument regarding the unfair advantage that candidates with vastly more resources would have over their rivals. It also does not address the obligation of democratic governments to ensure equal opportunities for all voices to be heard.
B. An upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warranted: This option aligns with the argument presented by the political scientist. It proposes the implementation of an upper limit on the amount of money that each candidate can spend on their political campaign. This limit aims to address the concern of candidates with excessive spending power having an unfair advantage, while still allowing individuals the freedom to spend money within certain boundaries.
C. Government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warranted: This option suggests that the government should provide subsidies to all political campaigns, albeit at a low percentage of their total cost. While this solution aims to level the playing field by providing support to all candidates, it does not directly address the issue of candidates with significantly greater resources having an unfair advantage. Additionally, it raises the question of whether it is practical or feasible for governments to subsidize all political campaigns.
D. All wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaigns: This option proposes that wealthy individuals should be prohibited from using their own money for political campaigns. While it may address concerns about the influence of wealth in politics, it contradicts the initial statement that individuals should be free to spend their money as they choose. This solution does not strike a balance between individual freedom and equal opportunities in political campaigns.
E. Each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spend: This option suggests complete freedom in campaign spending, allowing each candidate to spend as much money as they choose. However, this solution does not address the concern raised in the argument about candidates with vastly greater resources having an unfair advantage. It also does not align with the notion that democratic governments have an obligation to ensure equal opportunities for all voices to be heard.
Among these options, option B, which proposes an upper limit on political campaign spending, best aligns with the political scientist's argument by addressing the issue of unfair advantage while still respecting individual freedom to spend within certain limits.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup