Question Description
Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Political scientist: One of the most interesting dilemmas in contemporary democratic politics concerns the regulation of political campaign spending. People certainly should be free, within broad limits, to spend their money as they choose. On the other hand, candidates who can vastly outspend all rivals have an unfair advantage in publicizing their platforms. Democratic governments have a strong obligation to ensure that all voices have an equal chance to be heard, but governments should not subsidize expensive campaigns for each candidate. The resolution of the dilemma, therefore, is clear: _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the political scientist’s argument?a)only candidates with significant campaign resources should be permitted to run for public officeb)an upper limit on the political campaign spending of each candidate is warrantedc)government subsidization of all political campaigns at a low percentage of their total cost is warrantedd)all wealthy persons should be prohibited from spending their own money on political campaignse)each candidate should be allowed to spend as much money on a political campaign as any other candidate chooses to spendCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.