Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable th...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that person's consent, he is said to have committed theft.
Facts: During his visit to the house of 'C', 'A' asked 'B' the son of 'C', to accompany 'A' to the forest. Neither 'A' nor 'B' informed 'C' in his regard. 'B' accompained 'A' to the forest.
Facts: During his visit to the house of 'C', 'A' asked 'B' the son of 'C', to accompany 'A' to the forest. Neither 'A' nor 'B' informed 'C' in his regard. 'B' accompained 'A' to the forest.
- a)'A' has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of 'C'
- b)'A' has not committed theft
- c)'A' has committed theft
- d)'A' has not committed theft till 'B' did not accompany him
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any ...
There is no theft in the above case as there's no stealing or moving of any object from one place to another without any ntention . As there is no object discussed there's no theft . Theft means stealing or moving someone's property with his/her consent intentionally .
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any ...
Understanding the Principle of Theft
The principle of theft states that taking a moveable item from another person's property without their consent constitutes theft. In this scenario, we must analyze the actions of A and B regarding C's property.
Key Points of the Scenario
- Involvement of A and B: A invited B (the son of C) to accompany him to the forest without informing C.
- Consent of C: C, the owner of the house and the property, was not aware of A's invitation to B.
- Presence of B: B, being the son of C, had the capacity to consent to accompany A, but there is no indication that he had the authority to grant permission for A to take anything from C's property.
Analysis of A's Actions
- Entry into C's Property: A's entry into C's house is not theft in itself, as he did not take anything at that moment.
- B's Accompaniment: Although B accompanied A, this does not imply that A had the right to take anything from C's property.
Conclusion
- No Theft Committed: A has not committed theft simply by entering the house or even by having B accompany him. Theft would only occur if A actually took a moveable item from C's property without consent.
- Final Verdict: Therefore, the correct answer is that A has not committed theft (option 'B') until he actually takes something without consent.
In summary, A's actions do not fulfill the criteria of theft as outlined in the principle, making option 'B' the accurate choice.
The principle of theft states that taking a moveable item from another person's property without their consent constitutes theft. In this scenario, we must analyze the actions of A and B regarding C's property.
Key Points of the Scenario
- Involvement of A and B: A invited B (the son of C) to accompany him to the forest without informing C.
- Consent of C: C, the owner of the house and the property, was not aware of A's invitation to B.
- Presence of B: B, being the son of C, had the capacity to consent to accompany A, but there is no indication that he had the authority to grant permission for A to take anything from C's property.
Analysis of A's Actions
- Entry into C's Property: A's entry into C's house is not theft in itself, as he did not take anything at that moment.
- B's Accompaniment: Although B accompanied A, this does not imply that A had the right to take anything from C's property.
Conclusion
- No Theft Committed: A has not committed theft simply by entering the house or even by having B accompany him. Theft would only occur if A actually took a moveable item from C's property without consent.
- Final Verdict: Therefore, the correct answer is that A has not committed theft (option 'B') until he actually takes something without consent.
In summary, A's actions do not fulfill the criteria of theft as outlined in the principle, making option 'B' the accurate choice.
Attention Humanities/Arts Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts
Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing form the land of any person without that persons consent, he is said to have committed theft.Facts: During his visit to the house of C, A asked B the son of C, to accompany A to the forest. Neither A nor B informed C in his regard. B accompained A to the forest.a)A has committed theft as soon as the entered the house of Cb)A has not committed theftc)A has committed theftd)A has not committed theft till B did not accompany himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup