GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Health insurance insulates patients from the ... Start Learning for Free
Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.
The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?
  • a)
    assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidental
  • b)
    inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actions
  • c)
    presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principles
  • d)
    depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choices
  • e)
    assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decision
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, ...
(A) Assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidental.
This technique would involve attributing blame or responsibility to someone who had no actual influence or connection to the outcome. However, this technique is not used in the argument provided, as there is no mention of assigning responsibility based on coincidental involvement.
(B) Inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actions.
As explained earlier, this is the questionable technique used in the argument. The argument assumes that doctors frequently prescribe medical procedures solely because they lead to financial rewards, without considering other relevant factors that contribute to medical decision-making.
(C) Presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principles.
This technique refers to portraying decisions as arbitrary or whimsical when, in fact, they are based on clear and defined principles. The argument does not employ this technique, as it does not present medical decisions as capricious or idiosyncratic, but rather focuses on the influence of financial rewards on doctors' treatment choices.
(D) Depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choices.
This technique involves portraying choices as arbitrary by dismissing the reasons provided for those choices without any supporting argument. The argument does not utilize this technique either, as it does not specifically dismiss reasons given for doctors' treatment choices. Instead, it primarily focuses on the financial incentives and the potential impact they may have on doctors' behavior.
(E) Assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decision.
This technique assumes that if a particular consideration is irrelevant for one participant, it is automatically irrelevant for all participants involved in the decision. The argument does not rely on this technique, as it does not assume the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant automatically applies to all participants. Instead, it concentrates on the financial incentives faced by doctors.
Among the options provided, option (B) correctly identifies the questionable technique used in the argument, which is inferring the performance of certain actions based solely on the existence of incentive and opportunity, without considering other factors.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Health insurance insulates patients from the expense of medical care, giving doctors almost complete discretion in deciding the course of most medical treatments. Moreover, with doctors being paid for each procedure performed, they have an incentive to overtreat patients. It is thus clear that medical procedures administered by doctors are frequently prescribed only because these procedures lead to financial rewards.The argument uses which one of the following questionable techniques?a)assigning responsibility for a certain result to someone whose involvement in the events leading to that result was purely coincidentalb)inferring the performance of certain actions on no basis other than the existence of both incentive and opportunity for performing those actionsc)presenting as capricious and idiosyncratic decisions that are based on the rigorous application of well-defined principlesd)depicting choices as having been made arbitrarily by dismissing without argument reasons that have been given for these choicese)assuming that the irrelevance of a consideration for one participant in a decision makes that consideration irrelevant for each participant in the decisionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev