All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradicti... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermi's paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.
Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:
  • a)
    Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.
  • b)
    Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.
  • c)
    Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.
  • d)
    It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.
  • e)
    According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates...
The Fermi paradox is a thought-provoking question that raises concerns about the apparent contradiction between the high probability of the existence of technologically advanced extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence or contact with such civilizations. To resolve the paradox, scientists and researchers have put forward various explanations and hypotheses. Let's analyze each statement and its relevance to the Fermi paradox:
(A) Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to Earth, and hence the likelihood of extraterrestrial life is marginal.
This statement suggests that the development of complex life forms may require very specific conditions that are rare or unique to Earth. If this is true, then the absence of extraterrestrial civilizations could be explained by the rarity of the necessary conditions. However, it is important to note that the statement presents a belief held by some scientists and is not widely accepted or proven.
(B) Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere, but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts, as experienced on Earth, destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.
This statement proposes that although life may arise on other planets, destructive events such as ice ages or asteroid impacts prevent the development of complex life forms. This could explain why we haven't detected any technologically advanced civilizations. However, it assumes that these destructive events are common and universally prevent the evolution of complex life, which is speculative.
(C) Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after developing radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.
This statement suggests that technologically advanced civilizations might self-destruct due to the misuse of their advanced technology, resulting in their inability to make contact with other civilizations. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that civilizations tend to destroy themselves, which is one possible explanation for the lack of observable contact.
(D) It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy, but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.
This statement proposes that although advanced civilizations exist, the vast distances between stars and galaxies make effective two-way communication impractical. The size of the universe and the limitations of the speed of light could result in civilizations being too far apart to establish meaningful contact. This explanation aligns with the concept of the vastness of space and the challenges associated with interstellar communication.
(E) According to Judeo-Christian belief, God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.
This statement presents a religious perspective suggesting that humans are the only intelligent life in the universe based on Judeo-Christian belief. While this viewpoint represents a specific religious interpretation, it does not provide a scientific explanation or resolution to the Fermi paradox.
Among these statements, option (D) seems to be the most scientifically plausible explanation for the Fermi paradox. The vastness of the universe and the limitations of communication across large distances could result in the absence of observable contact between advanced civilizations. However, it is important to note that the Fermi paradox is still a topic of active scientific debate, and multiple factors could contribute to the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial civilizations.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates...
The Fermi paradox is a thought-provoking question that raises concerns about the apparent contradiction between the high probability of the existence of technologically advanced extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence or contact with such civilizations. To resolve the paradox, scientists and researchers have put forward various explanations and hypotheses. Let's analyze each statement and its relevance to the Fermi paradox:
(A) Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to Earth, and hence the likelihood of extraterrestrial life is marginal.
This statement suggests that the development of complex life forms may require very specific conditions that are rare or unique to Earth. If this is true, then the absence of extraterrestrial civilizations could be explained by the rarity of the necessary conditions. However, it is important to note that the statement presents a belief held by some scientists and is not widely accepted or proven.
(B) Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere, but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts, as experienced on Earth, destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.
This statement proposes that although life may arise on other planets, destructive events such as ice ages or asteroid impacts prevent the development of complex life forms. This could explain why we haven't detected any technologically advanced civilizations. However, it assumes that these destructive events are common and universally prevent the evolution of complex life, which is speculative.
(C) Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after developing radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.
This statement suggests that technologically advanced civilizations might self-destruct due to the misuse of their advanced technology, resulting in their inability to make contact with other civilizations. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that civilizations tend to destroy themselves, which is one possible explanation for the lack of observable contact.
(D) It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy, but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.
This statement proposes that although advanced civilizations exist, the vast distances between stars and galaxies make effective two-way communication impractical. The size of the universe and the limitations of the speed of light could result in civilizations being too far apart to establish meaningful contact. This explanation aligns with the concept of the vastness of space and the challenges associated with interstellar communication.
(E) According to Judeo-Christian belief, God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.
This statement presents a religious perspective suggesting that humans are the only intelligent life in the universe based on Judeo-Christian belief. While this viewpoint represents a specific religious interpretation, it does not provide a scientific explanation or resolution to the Fermi paradox.
Among these statements, option (D) seems to be the most scientifically plausible explanation for the Fermi paradox. The vastness of the universe and the limitations of communication across large distances could result in the absence of observable contact between advanced civilizations. However, it is important to note that the Fermi paradox is still a topic of active scientific debate, and multiple factors could contribute to the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial civilizations.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.The passage provides support for which of the following statements?

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is true about the current state of quantum computing?

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q. Which of the following titles best encapsulates the main idea of the passage?

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about quantum computers compared to classical computers?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations. Stated formally, Fermis paradox states: the size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extra-terrestrial civilizations ought to exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.Which of the following statements if true would most help to explain/resolve the Fermi paradox:a)Some scientists believe that the conditions needed for complex life to evolve are unique to earth and hence the likelihood of extra-terrestrial life is marginal.b)Life forms do arise and evolve elsewhere but events such as ice ages, asteroid impacts as experienced on earth destroy life before complex life forms can evolve.c)Technological civilizations may destroy themselves before or shortly after radio or space flight technology through nuclear or biological warfare or accidental contamination.d)It may be that advanced civilizations exist in our galaxy but they are simply too far apart for two-way communication to be effective.e)According to Judeo-Christian belief God has placed human beings as the only intelligent life in the universe.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup