The correct answer is option 'D' - Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru.

Explanation:

The Government of India Act, 1935 was an important piece of legislation passed by the British Parliament that aimed to introduce significant reforms in the governance of British India. However, many Indian leaders and political parties criticized this act for its limitations and shortcomings. Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, who later became the first Prime Minister of India, was one of the prominent leaders who expressed strong dissent against the act and described it as a new charter of bondage.

Nehru's criticism of the Government of India Act, 1935 can be understood in the following context:

1. Lack of complete independence: Nehru believed that the act did not provide for the full independence and self-governance that India desired. Instead, it continued to maintain British control over key aspects of governance and administration.

2. Retention of the Governor-General's powers: The act retained the position of the Governor-General, who was appointed by the British government and had extensive powers. Nehru saw this as a continuation of colonial control rather than a move towards true self-rule.

3. Limited franchise and representation: The act introduced a system of limited franchise and separate electorates based on communal lines, which Nehru viewed as divisive and detrimental to the principles of secularism and national unity. He believed that the act did not adequately represent the aspirations of the Indian people.

4. Inadequate provisions for social and economic reforms: Nehru felt that the act did not adequately address the pressing social and economic issues of the time, such as poverty, inequality, and land reforms. He believed that a more comprehensive approach was needed to bring about meaningful change.

5. Nehru's vision for a free India: Nehru, along with other leaders of the Indian National Congress, advocated for complete independence and a democratic socialist society. He saw the Government of India Act, 1935 as a hindrance to achieving these goals and therefore criticized it as a new form of bondage.

In conclusion, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru criticized the Government of India Act, 1935 as a new charter of bondage because he believed that it did not provide for the complete independence and self-governance that India desired, retained colonial control through the Governor-General's powers, had limited franchise and representation, and failed to address pressing social and economic issues. Nehru's critique reflected his vision for a free and democratic India.