Amongst the following, which committee is not associated with the elec...
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'A' - Ashok Mehta Committee.
Explanation:
Ashok Mehta Committee:
The Ashok Mehta Committee was not associated with electoral reforms in India. It was formed in 1977 and its main objective was to study the functioning of the Panchayati Raj institutions and suggest measures for their improvement. The committee submitted its report in 1978, which led to the enactment of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act in 1992, providing constitutional status to the Panchayati Raj institutions.
Dinesh Goswami Committee:
The Dinesh Goswami Committee was formed in 1990 to review the electoral system in India and make recommendations for its improvement. The committee recommended the introduction of proportional representation with the single transferable vote (PR-STV) system for the Lok Sabha elections. However, its recommendations were not implemented.
Tarkunde Committee:
The Tarkunde Committee, also known as the Committee on Electoral Reforms, was formed in 1974 to examine various aspects of the electoral system in India and suggest measures for its improvement. The committee submitted its report in 1975, which recommended several reforms, including the introduction of proportional representation and the use of state funding for elections.
Indrajit Gupta Committee:
The Indrajit Gupta Committee was formed in 1998 to review the criminal justice system in India and suggest reforms to make it more effective and efficient. While the committee's focus was not specifically on electoral reforms, it did make recommendations related to the criminalization of politics and the need for electoral reforms to address this issue.
Conclusion:
Amongst the given options, the committee that is not associated with electoral reforms in India is the Ashok Mehta Committee.
Amongst the following, which committee is not associated with the elec...
Key Points
- Ashok Mehta Committee
- It was constituted in 1977 by the Janata Government under the chairmanship of Ashok Mehta.
- This committee submitted its report in 1978 and gave some recommendations:
- The 3-tier system of Panchayati Raj should be replaced by the 2- tier System: Zilla Parishad at district levels and below it the Mandal Panchayat at village levels.
- Zilla Parishad should be the executive body and made responsible for planning at the district level.
- Seats for SCs and STs should be reserved based on their population.
- The State government should not supersede the Panchayati Raj institutions.
- There should be an official participation of political parties at all levels of Panchayat elections.
- The Panchayati Raj institutions should have compulsory powers of taxation to mobilize their own financial resources.
- The Chief Electoral Officer of state in consultation with the Chief Election Commissioner should organize and conduct the Panchayati Raj elections.
- Development functions should be transferred to the Zila Parishad and all development staff should work under its control and supervision.
- A minister for Panchayati Raj should be appointed in the state council of ministers to look after the affairs of the Panchayati Raj institutions.
Additional Information
The Dinesh Goswami Committee was concerned with electoral reforms.
- The Dinesh Goswami Committee was formed in 1990.
- This committee was concerned with the electoral reforms.
- It recommended that there is a need for restructuring of the accounting of election expenses.
- According to the committee, the army and para-military personnel, diplomats, and other citizens living outside India shall be allowed proxy voting.
- In addition, it recommended that the security deposit for Lok Sabha and Assembly should be increased to Rs. 5000 and Rs. 2500 respectively.
- Furthermore, it also suggested that a candidate should not be allowed to contest from more than two constituencies.
Indrajit Gupta
- Indrajit Gupta was the chairman of the committee on state funding of elections.
- It was an 8-member committee that was set up by the all-party conference in May 1998.
Tarkunde Committee
- Jayprakash Narayan had appointed a committee to study and report on the scheme for electoral reforms in 1974 under the chairmanship of V.M. Tarkunde known as JP Committee or Tarkunde Committee.
- Besides other recommendations, the Committee recommended that the minimum age of voting should be 18 years. It was enacted by the 61st Amendment Act of 1988.
- The committee submitted the report in 1975.
- Vithal Mahadeo Tarkunde has been referred to as the "Father of the Civil Liberties movement" in India.