GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Recently, animal right advocates have shown a...
Start Learning for Free
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.
Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?
- a)It is the author's primary conclusion.
- b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.
- c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.
- d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the author's main point.
- e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow sci...
(A) It is the author's primary conclusion:
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is the main conclusion or main point of the author's argument. However, the highlighted sentence is not the ultimate conclusion of the passage; it is a supporting statement that contributes to the author's overall argument.
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is the main conclusion or main point of the author's argument. However, the highlighted sentence is not the ultimate conclusion of the passage; it is a supporting statement that contributes to the author's overall argument.
(B) It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis:
This option accurately describes the purpose of the highlighted sentence. The author uses an example (the distinction between dogs and snakes) and an analogy (the distinction between humans and dogs) to emphasize the idea that all animals should be granted the same rights, regardless of their perceived aesthetic appeal.
This option accurately describes the purpose of the highlighted sentence. The author uses an example (the distinction between dogs and snakes) and an analogy (the distinction between humans and dogs) to emphasize the idea that all animals should be granted the same rights, regardless of their perceived aesthetic appeal.
(C) It is the primary support of the conclusion:
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is the main supporting point for the author's overall conclusion. While the highlighted sentence does provide support for the author's argument, it is not the primary support. The primary support would likely be the combination of various statements and evidence throughout the passage.
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is the main supporting point for the author's overall conclusion. While the highlighted sentence does provide support for the author's argument, it is not the primary support. The primary support would likely be the combination of various statements and evidence throughout the passage.
(D) It implicitly rebuts criticism of the author's main point:
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence serves as a rebuttal to criticism of the author's main point. However, the sentence itself does not directly address or rebut any specific criticism. It is more focused on reinforcing the author's argument by highlighting the inconsistency in granting rights to certain animals while denying them to others.
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence serves as a rebuttal to criticism of the author's main point. However, the sentence itself does not directly address or rebut any specific criticism. It is more focused on reinforcing the author's argument by highlighting the inconsistency in granting rights to certain animals while denying them to others.
(E) It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described:
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is irrelevant or unrelated to the phenomenon or argument described in the passage. However, the sentence is indeed relevant to the phenomenon being discussed, as it reinforces the author's argument about granting equal rights to all animals.
This option suggests that the highlighted sentence is irrelevant or unrelated to the phenomenon or argument described in the passage. However, the sentence is indeed relevant to the phenomenon being discussed, as it reinforces the author's argument about granting equal rights to all animals.
Overall, option (B) best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold. It adds emphasis to the author's argument through the use of an example and an analogy.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Recently, animal right advocates have shown a willingness to allow scientists to perform cruel experiments on snakes and rats. This willingness betrays the very principles on which our movement depends. Protesting only the misuses of dogs, cats and chimpanzees is not enough. The same rights must be granted to all animals, regardless of how they strike our aesthetic sense. The line drawn between dogs and snakes is every bit as intolerable as that drawn between humans and dogs.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the sentence highlighted in bold?a)It is the authors primary conclusion.b)It uses an example and analogy to add emphasis.c)It is the primary support of the conclusion.d)It implicitly rebuts criticism of the authors main point.e)It is irrelevant to the phenomenon described.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup