GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of...
Start Learning for Free
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?
- a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.
- b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.
- c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.
- d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.
- e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in...
Let's go through each answer choice and explain why option (D) is the correct answer for the flaw in the reasoning.
(A) The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.
This answer choice suggests that the flaw lies in the assumption that cigarette taxes are the only possible means of funding education programs. However, the argument doesn't make this assumption. It simply proposes that the additional revenue from cigarette taxes could be used to supplement the education budget, without ruling out other funding sources. Therefore, (A) is not the correct answer.
This answer choice suggests that the flaw lies in the assumption that cigarette taxes are the only possible means of funding education programs. However, the argument doesn't make this assumption. It simply proposes that the additional revenue from cigarette taxes could be used to supplement the education budget, without ruling out other funding sources. Therefore, (A) is not the correct answer.
(B) The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.
This answer choice suggests that the author assumes that the additional tax on cigarettes is both sufficient and necessary to achieve both the revenue goal and the health improvement goal. However, the argument doesn't explicitly make this assumption. It suggests that the tax would achieve both goals, but it doesn't claim that the tax is the only way to achieve these goals. Therefore, (B) is not the correct answer.
This answer choice suggests that the author assumes that the additional tax on cigarettes is both sufficient and necessary to achieve both the revenue goal and the health improvement goal. However, the argument doesn't explicitly make this assumption. It suggests that the tax would achieve both goals, but it doesn't claim that the tax is the only way to achieve these goals. Therefore, (B) is not the correct answer.
(C) The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.
This answer choice suggests that the author overlooks the positive effects of public smoking bans on reducing second-hand smoke. However, the argument doesn't address or overlook the effects of smoking bans. It focuses on the potential benefits of higher cigarette prices due to the additional tax. Therefore, (C) is not the correct answer.
This answer choice suggests that the author overlooks the positive effects of public smoking bans on reducing second-hand smoke. However, the argument doesn't address or overlook the effects of smoking bans. It focuses on the potential benefits of higher cigarette prices due to the additional tax. Therefore, (C) is not the correct answer.
(D) The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.
This answer choice correctly identifies the flaw in the reasoning. The argument assumes that achieving one goal (revenue generation) would automatically lead to the success of the other goal (health improvement). However, the argument fails to consider that the success of one goal may negatively impact the success of the other. For example, if smokers reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke due to higher prices, the revenue generated from the tax may be lower than expected. Therefore, (D) is the correct answer.
This answer choice correctly identifies the flaw in the reasoning. The argument assumes that achieving one goal (revenue generation) would automatically lead to the success of the other goal (health improvement). However, the argument fails to consider that the success of one goal may negatively impact the success of the other. For example, if smokers reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke due to higher prices, the revenue generated from the tax may be lower than expected. Therefore, (D) is the correct answer.
(E) The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.
This answer choice suggests that the author assumes a correlation between low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs. However, the argument doesn't make this assumption. It proposes a solution to increase revenue for education programs but doesn't explicitly connect it to low cigarette taxes causing the cutbacks. Therefore, (E) is not the correct answer.
This answer choice suggests that the author assumes a correlation between low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs. However, the argument doesn't make this assumption. It proposes a solution to increase revenue for education programs but doesn't explicitly connect it to low cigarette taxes causing the cutbacks. Therefore, (E) is not the correct answer.
In conclusion, the flaw in the argument's reasoning is that the author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal's goals (revenue generation) would negatively impact the success of the other goal (health improvement). This makes option (D) the correct answer.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?a)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.b)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.c)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.d)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.e)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup