All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  That the policy of nuclear deterrence has wor... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.
Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?
  • a)
    Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country's economy.
  • b)
    From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.
  • c)
    Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.
  • d)
    The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.
  • e)
    It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestio...
Flaw in the Argument:

Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country's economy.

Explanation:

- The argument states that nuclear deterrence has been successful in preventing a third world war between superpowers.
- The flaw in the argument lies in the assumption that it was specifically nuclear deterrence that prevented a major conflict, without considering other factors.
- The statement suggests that the economic burden of maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments could be a deterrent in itself, as it diverts resources away from other essential areas.
- Therefore, it is possible that the economic implications of engaging in a nuclear conflict played a role in preventing such a war, rather than solely relying on the concept of nuclear deterrence.
- This indicates that the argument may oversimplify the reasons for the absence of a third world war between superpowers and fail to consider alternative explanations for this outcome.

In conclusion, the flaw in the argument is that it assumes nuclear deterrence was the sole factor in preventing a major conflict, without acknowledging other potential reasons, such as the economic consequences of engaging in a nuclear war.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestio...
Let's go through each answer choice and analyze how it indicates a potential flaw in the argument:
(A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country's economy.
This answer choice doesn't necessarily indicate a flaw in the argument. While it suggests that maintaining nuclear armaments has an economic cost, it doesn't directly challenge the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence.
(B) From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.
This answer choice points out the limitations of relying solely on past events to predict the future. It suggests that even though a third world war hasn't occurred yet, it doesn't guarantee that it won't happen in the future due to unforeseen accidents or events. This undermines the argument's assertion that nuclear deterrence has worked without question.
(C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.
This answer choice suggests that producing excessive nuclear weapons beyond what is necessary for deterrence could lead to a higher probability of a nuclear accident. If nuclear accidents were to occur, it would challenge the argument's assumption that the existence of nuclear weapons alone has been sufficient to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by major powers.
(D) The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.
This answer choice presents evidence that major powers have participated in smaller-scale military operations without resorting to nuclear confrontation. This challenges the argument's assertion that the existence of nuclear weapons is the sole reason for major powers refraining from nuclear conflict.
(E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.
This answer choice raises the possibility that factors other than nuclear deterrence, such as economic considerations, may have played a role in preventing a third world war between superpowers. It suggests that the argument's assumption attributing the absence of a third world war solely to nuclear deterrence is flawed.
Given the above analysis, the answer that indicates a flaw in the argument is (E). It suggests that the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence cannot be conclusively determined, as other factors may have influenced the avoidance of a third world war.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

PassageMost educated people of the eighteenth century, such as the Founding Fathers, subscribed to Natural Rights Theory, the idea that every human being has a considerable number of innate rights, simply by virtue of being a human person. When the US Constitution was sent to the states for ratification, many at that time felt that the federal government outlined by the Constitution would be too strong, and that rights of individual citizens against the government had to be clarified. This led to the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, which were ratified at the same time as the Constitution. The first eight of these amendments list specific rights of citizens. Some leaders feared that listingsomerights could be interpreted to mean that citizens didn’t haveother, unlisted rights. Toward this end, James Madison and others produced the Ninth Amendment, which states: the fact that certain rights are listed in the Constitution shall not be construed to imply that other rights of the people are deniedConstitutional traditionalists interpret the Ninth Amendment as a rule for reading the rest of the constitution. They would argue that “Ninth Amendment rights” are a misconceived notion: the amendment does not, by itself, create federally enforceable rights. In particular, this strict reasoning would be opposed to the creation of any new rights based on the amendment. Rather, according to this view, the amendment merely protects those rights that citizens already have, whether they are explicitly listed in the Constitution or simply implicit in people’s lives and in American tradition.More liberal interpreters of the US Constitution have a much more expansive view of the Ninth Amendment. In their view, the Ninth Amendment guarantees to American citizens a vast universe of potential rights, some of which we have enjoyed for two centuries, and others that the Founding Fathers could not possibly have conceived. These scholars point out that some rights, such as voting rights of women or minorities, were not necessarily viewed as rights by the majority of citizens in late eighteenth century America, but are taken as fundamental and unquestionable in modern America. While those rights cited are protected specifically by other amendments and laws, the argument asserts that other unlisted right also could evolve from unthinkable to perfectly acceptable, and the Ninth Amendment would protect these as-yet-undefined rights.Q.The author cites the scholars referring to “voting rights of women or minorities” in order to

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Which of the following concerns about vertical farming is mentioned in the passage?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a countrys economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup