GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the crimi...
Start Learning for Free
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.
Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.
Which of the following best describes Dylan's response to Alan?
- a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different country
- b)Dylan partially agrees with Alan's reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the government
- c)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universally
- d)Dylan challenges Alan's reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are not
- e)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogy
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted o...
Dylan's response to Alan can be best described as D. Dylan challenges Alan's reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are not.
Dylan provides a counterargument to Alan's claim that reducing poverty and increasing funding to education will effectively bring down overall crime rate and reduce the threat from terrorism. Dylan highlights a specific study conducted in a different country that shows terrorists, unlike other criminals, tend to be better educated and not necessarily from lower income classes. By doing so, Dylan challenges the assumption made by Alan that the factors contributing to theft and murder are the same as those contributing to terrorism. Dylan's response questions the similarity between the two situations and presents an alternative perspective, thus challenging Alan's reasoning.
Most Upvoted Answer
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted o...
Dylan's response to Alan can be best described as D. Dylan challenges Alan's reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are not.
Dylan provides a counterargument to Alan's claim that reducing poverty and increasing funding to education will effectively bring down overall crime rate and reduce the threat from terrorism. Dylan highlights a specific study conducted in a different country that shows terrorists, unlike other criminals, tend to be better educated and not necessarily from lower income classes. By doing so, Dylan challenges the assumption made by Alan that the factors contributing to theft and murder are the same as those contributing to terrorism. Dylan's response questions the similarity between the two situations and presents an alternative perspective, thus challenging Alan's reasoning.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted o...
Explanation:
Dylans response to Alan:
- Dylan challenges Alans reasoning: Dylan challenges Alans argument by providing a counterpoint that terrorism is not necessarily linked to lower income classes or lack of education. He explains that unlike crimes like theft, terrorism is motivated by political or religious ideologies, which can attract individuals from various backgrounds.
By presenting this alternative perspective, Dylan effectively refutes Alans assumption that reducing poverty and improving education would directly address the issue of terrorism. Instead, he highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of terrorism, indicating that a different approach may be needed to combat this particular type of crime.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup