All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.
In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
  • a)
    This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
  • b)
    The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.
  • c)
    The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.
  • d)
    The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.
  • e)
    The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the ...
Let's break down the argument and examine each statement to determine its role:
Statement 1: "Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate."
Statement 2: "Experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails."
Now, let's analyze the roles of these statements:
Statement 1 challenges the commonly held belief or assumption about the force dolphins are able to exert based on their physiology. It presents the conclusion of Sir James Gray's calculations, which suggests that the propulsive force dolphins can generate is insufficient to explain their swimming speed and acceleration.
Statement 2 introduces new evidence obtained through experiments and mathematical modeling. It counters the conclusion drawn by Sir James Gray by revealing that dolphins actually exert considerably more force with their tails than previously expected.
Based on this analysis, we can conclude that the roles of the boldfaced portions are as follows:
The first boldfaced portion (Statement 1) presents an opinion or assumption that the author seeks to challenge or refute.
The second boldfaced portion (Statement 2) is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise. It provides evidence that contradicts the initial assumption and supports the idea that the force exerted by dolphins' tails easily explains their swimming speed and acceleration.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) "The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise."
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: Are we detecting a greenhouse effect, and related to this, is it exacerbated by "homogenic factors," i.e., human actions? Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations? Within scientific communities and associated scientifically informed circles, the answers have to be somewhat more ambiguous, particularly when rigorous questions concerning evidence are raised. Were scientific truth to be a matter of consensus, and some argue that scientific truth often turns out to be just that, then it is clear that there is beginning to be a kind of majority consensus among many earth science practitioners that the temperature of the Earth, particularly of the oceans, is indeed rising and that this is a crucial indicator for a possible greenhouse effect. Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere. And the fact of the matter is that "whole earth measurements" are still rare and primitive in the simple sense that we simply do not have enough thermometers out. Secondly, even if we had enough thermometers, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years. Thirdly, even if we know that the earth is now heating up, has an ever increasing ozone hole, and from this strange weather effects can be predicted, how much of this is due to homorganic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like? Is it really the case, as Science magazine claimed in l990, "24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homorganic origin"?Q. The author’s claim that, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years would be strengthened if the author

Though the truism about Inuits having a hundred words for snow is an exaggeration, languages really are full of charming quirks that reveal the character of a culture. Dialects of Scottish Gaelic, for instance, traditionally spoken in the Highlands and, later on, in fishing villages, have a great many very specific words for seaweed, as well as names for each of the components of a rabbit snare and a word for an egg that emerges from a hen sans shell. Unfortunately for those who find these details fascinating, languages are going extinct at an incredible clip, - one dies every 14 days - and linguists are rushing around with tape recorders and word lists, trying to record at least a fragment of each before they go. The only way the old tongues will stick around is if populations themselves decide that there is something of value in them, whether for reasons of patriotism, cultural heritage, or just to lure in some language-curious tourists. But even when the general public opinion is for preservation of their linguistic diversity, linguists are finding it increasingly difficult to achieve such a task.Mathematicians can help linguists out in this mission. To provide a test environment for programs that encourage the learning of endangered local languages, Anne Kandler and her colleagues decided to make a mathematical model of the speakers of Scottish Gaelic. This was an apposite choice because the local population was already becoming increasingly conscious about the cultural value of their language and statistics of the Gaelic speakers was readily available. The model the mathematicians built not only uses statistics such as the number of people speaking the languages, the number of polyglots and rate of change in these numbers but also figures which represent the economic value of the language and the perceived cultural value amongst people. These numbers were substituted in the differential equations of the model to find out the number of new Gaelic speakers required annually to stop the dwindling of the Gaelic population. The estimate of the number determined by Kandlers research helped the national Gaelic Development Agency to formulate an effective plan towards the preserving the language. Many languages such as Quechua, Chinook and Istrian Vlashki can be saved using such mathematical models. Results from mathematical equations can be useful in strategically planning preservation strategies. Similarly mathematical analysis of languages which have survived against many odds can also provide useful insights which can be applied towards saving other endangered languages.The passage is primarily concerned with which of the following?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)This first is a piece of evidence supporting the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.b)The first is a false conclusion based on an incorrect premise; the second is the revised conclusion drawn from the corrected premise.c)The first is an opinion the author seeks to refute; the second is the opinion the author supports.d)The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.e)The first is a generally held assumption; the second is a conclusion that violates that assumption.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup