Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should US gun laws be radically changed to prevent the recurrence of mass shooting incidents?Arguments:I. Yes, Texas, the location of the latest deadly mass shooting, allows its residents to openly carry assault rifles.II. No, the US is an independent state and the right of people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.