UGC NET Exam  >  UGC NET Questions  >  Directions: In making decisions about an impo... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.
Q. Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?
Arguments:
I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.
II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.
  • a)
    Only argument I is strong.
  • b)
    Only argument II is strong.
  • c)
    Either I or II is strong.
  • d)
    Both I and II are strong.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is des...
Strong and Weak Arguments for Shifting Focus to Other Games in India

Argument I: No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.
- This argument is a weak one because it diverts attention from the main question of whether Indians should shift their focus to other games instead of cricket.
- While issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation are indeed important, they are not directly related to the question of improving performance in the Olympics through focusing on other sports.
- It is possible for India to address multiple issues simultaneously, including both social issues and sports development.

Argument II: Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.
- This argument is a strong one as it directly addresses the question at hand by highlighting the potential impact of shifting focus to other sports.
- By acknowledging that many talented athletes may have lost hope due to the dominance of cricket in India's sports culture, this argument suggests a valid reason for diversifying the focus towards other games to improve overall performance in international competitions like the Olympics.
- Focusing on other sports can provide opportunities for a wider pool of athletes to excel and represent India on a global stage.
In conclusion, while argument I is weak due to its lack of direct relevance to the question, argument II is strong as it presents a compelling reason for considering a shift in focus towards other games in India.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is des...
Argument I is weak because it is not relevant to context. Argument II is strong because it gives a 'valid' reason that supports the question of giving importance to other sports than cricket only. So, option (2) is the correct answer.
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam

Similar UGC NET Doubts

Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam

Top Courses for UGC NET

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev