Question Description
Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Lawyer: Juries are traditionally given their instructions in convoluted, legalistic language. The verbiage is intended to make the instructions more precise, but greater precision is of little use if most jurors have difficulty understanding the instructions. Since it is more important for jurors to have a basic but adequate understanding of their role than it is for the details of that role to be precisely specified, jury instructions should be formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language.Each of the following, if true, strengthens the lawyers argument EXCEPT:a)Most jurors are less likely to understand instructions given in convoluted, legalistic language than instructions given in simple, easily comprehensible language.b)Most jurors do not have an adequate understanding of their role after being given jury instructions in convoluted, legalistic language.c)Jury instructions formulated in simple, easily comprehensible language can adequately describe the role of the jurors.d)The details of the role of the jurors cannot be specified with complete precision in simple, easily comprehensible language.e)Jurors do not need to know the precise details of their role in order to have an adequate understanding of that role.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.