All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Which of the following most logically complet... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming that
  • a)
    the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworks
  • b)
    the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possible
  • c)
    the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took place
  • d)
    Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow range
  • e)
    Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riot
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is ...
A. the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworks. This option is not relevant to the argument. The argument is focused on the dating of the riot depicted in the painting Aarne, not on whether the public building is depicted in other artworks. The presence or absence of the public building in other artworks does not impact the conclusion that the riot took place between 1563 and 1565.
B. the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possible. This option is not necessary to complete the argument. While it may be desirable for the artist to intend an accurate depiction of the riot, the argument is already based on the assumption that the painting portrays the riot and the destruction of the public building. The intention of the artist does not provide additional support for the conclusion that the riot took place between 1563 and 1565.
C. the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took place. This option logically completes the argument. The argument relies on the presence of a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565 in the background of the painting Aarne. To support the conclusion that the riot depicted in the painting actually took place between 1563 and 1565, it is necessary to assume that the painting accurately represents the physical setting of the riot. If the painting accurately depicts the scene, including the presence of the public building, it strengthens the conclusion that the riot occurred within the specified time frame.
D. Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow range. This option is not necessary to complete the argument. The argument is focused on the specific evidence provided by the painting Aarne itself, such as the portrayal of the public building and the riot. Whether or not Aarne is the first Finnish artwork with a narrow dating range does not impact the conclusion drawn from the evidence presented.
E. Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riot. This option is not relevant to the argument. The argument does not rely on whether or not the painter of Aarne was involved in the riot depicted. It focuses on the evidence provided by the painting itself, such as the portrayal of the public building and the riot, to draw a conclusion about the timeframe in which the riot took place.
Based on the given argument, option (C) is the most logical completion as it directly supports the conclusion by assuming that the painting accurately represents the physical setting of the riot at the time it took place.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all GMAT courses
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is ...
A. the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworks. This option is not relevant to the argument. The argument is focused on the dating of the riot depicted in the painting Aarne, not on whether the public building is depicted in other artworks. The presence or absence of the public building in other artworks does not impact the conclusion that the riot took place between 1563 and 1565.
B. the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possible. This option is not necessary to complete the argument. While it may be desirable for the artist to intend an accurate depiction of the riot, the argument is already based on the assumption that the painting portrays the riot and the destruction of the public building. The intention of the artist does not provide additional support for the conclusion that the riot took place between 1563 and 1565.
C. the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took place. This option logically completes the argument. The argument relies on the presence of a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565 in the background of the painting Aarne. To support the conclusion that the riot depicted in the painting actually took place between 1563 and 1565, it is necessary to assume that the painting accurately represents the physical setting of the riot. If the painting accurately depicts the scene, including the presence of the public building, it strengthens the conclusion that the riot occurred within the specified time frame.
D. Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow range. This option is not necessary to complete the argument. The argument is focused on the specific evidence provided by the painting Aarne itself, such as the portrayal of the public building and the riot. Whether or not Aarne is the first Finnish artwork with a narrow dating range does not impact the conclusion drawn from the evidence presented.
E. Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riot. This option is not relevant to the argument. The argument does not rely on whether or not the painter of Aarne was involved in the riot depicted. It focuses on the evidence provided by the painting itself, such as the portrayal of the public building and the riot, to draw a conclusion about the timeframe in which the riot took place.
Based on the given argument, option (C) is the most logical completion as it directly supports the conclusion by assuming that the painting accurately represents the physical setting of the riot at the time it took place.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of “rigid” work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications.Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. In return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job¬-security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work-life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management.Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions.Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. If proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a companys problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels—a competition they cannot win.The passage provides information to answer which of the following questions?

Window 1: News Article in Major NewspaperIf current trends continue, 24 million men will find themselves bachelors for life by 2020. China’s “one-child policy” has had an unintended effect: the narrowing of the gene pool. Female children are aborted more than 50 percent of the time, because families want a male heir. From 2000 to 2013, the sex-ratio at birth has gradually climbed to 117:100 in favor of male births, meaning that for every 117 boys only 100 girls were born.Window 2: Interview with Genetic ExpertThe one-child policy, first put into effect in the 1980s, was designed to slow the rapid growth of the Chinese people, as that growth was causing severe overcrowding. Leaders believed the policy would protect the country’s resources and improve productivity. Unfortunately, they did not foresee that the long-held preference for male heirs would lead to a substantial gender imbalance.Since the introduction of the policy, the fertility rate among Chinese women has dropped from just over 3 births per woman to just 1.8. It is estimated that even though the country has reduced births by roughly 50 percent, there are still 1 million more children born each week than people dying, creating a steady increase in population in spite of the law.Window 3: Commentary on the social side effectsThe gender imbalance resulting from China’s one-child policy has produced noticeable side effects. The more severe this imbalance becomes, the more severe its social side effects will be.The imbalance causes men who know they are unlikely to form strong family ties to become vagrants. The nation has experienced an increased crime rate that is frequently linked to a large transient population of about 80 million unmarried, low-status, adult males. These individuals are commonly willing to resort to crime to improve their situations, given they have no family ties and perceive that they have nothing to lose.Q. Suppose that over the next 10 years, for every 100 female children born the number of male births reaches 160. If all of the information in the three sources is accurate, the number of male births for every female birth would be closest to ________.

According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of “rigid” work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications.Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. In return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job¬-security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work-life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management.Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions.Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. If proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a companys problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels—a competition they cannot win.The passage is primarily concerned with the

Proverbial wisdom states that birds of a feather flock together. Studies have shown that people of similar geographical and educational backgrounds and functional experience are extremely likely to found companies together. Not considering spousal teams in the dataset, it has been found that a founding team is five times more likely to be all-male or all-female team. Also, it is more likely to find founding teams that are remarkably homogenous with regard to skills and functional backgrounds. Homogeneity has important benefits. For the founder struggling to meet the challenges of a growing startup, selecting cofounders from among the people with whom he or she probably has important things in common is often the quickest and easiest solution. Not only does it generally take less time to find such people, but it also generally takes less time to develop effective working relationships with such similar people. When founders share a background, they share a common language that facilitates communication, ensuring that the team begins the work relationship with a mutual understanding and hence can skip over part of the learning curve that would absorb the energies of people with very different backgrounds. Increasing homogeneity may therefore be a particularly alluring- and, in some ways, a particularly sensible - approach for novice founders heading into unfamiliar territory. Certainly, studies have found that the greater the heterogeneity among executive team members, the greater the risk of interpersonal conflict and the lower the group-level integration. Even though it is very appealing to opt for the comfortable and easy decision to found with similar cofounders, by doing so founders may be causing long-term problems. Teams with a wide range of pertinent functional skills may be able to build more valuable and enduring startups. Conversely, homogenous teams tend to have overlapping human capital, making it more likely that the team will have redundant strengths and be missing critical skills.Which of the following can be inferred about start-ups that comprise of homogenous teams?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following most logically completes the argument?Aarne is an old Finnish artwork whose painter and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the painting portrays a riot thought to have taken place sometime between 1563 and 1567, and in the background of the scene stands a public building known to have been destroyed in 1565. Thus the riot depicted in the painting must have actually taken place between 1563 and 1565, assuming thata)the public building is not depicted in any other Finnish artworksb)the artist of Aarne intended it to be as accurate a depiction of the riot as possiblec)the painting accurately depicts the physical setting of the riot at the time it took placed)Aarne is the first Finnish artwork whose potential dates of composition can be restricted to such a narrow rangee)Aarne was not painted by a person involved in the riotCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup