Question Description
Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.The need for knowledge of the constitution and functions, in the concrete, of human nature is great just because the teachers attitude to subject matter is so different from that of the pupil. The teacher presents in actuality what the pupil represents only in posse. That is, the teacher already knows the things which the student is only learning. Hence the problem of the two is radically unlike. When engaged in the direct act of teaching, the instructor needs to have subject matter at his fingers ends; his attention should be upon the attitude and response of the pupil. To understand the latter in its interplay with subject matter is his task, while the pupils mind, naturally, should be not on itself but on the topic in hand. Or to state the same point in a somewhat different manner: the teacher should be occupied not with subject matter in itself but in its interaction with the pupils present needs and capacities. Hence simple scholarship is not enough.Q.It can be inferred from the paragraph that:a)simple scholarship is lop-sided in its focusb)simple scholarship might overlook the subject matter and focus purely on the studentc)simple scholarship, with a narrow focus, might not place enough emphasis on the student’s needsd)simple scholarship will always be lopsided in nature because of its ambiguous stand on problemse)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.