All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The simple facts are these: the number of peo... Start Learning for Free
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?
  • a)
    Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.
  • b)
    Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.
  • c)
    The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.
  • d)
    A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.
  • e)
    Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by g...

Assumption: The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something's dangerousness.

Explanation:

Importance of Fatalities:
- The author compares the number of people killed by grizzly bears to other causes of death, such as lightning strikes on golf courses and electric blender accidents.
- By equating the number of fatalities from different sources, the author suggests that the number of deaths per year is a reliable measure of how dangerous something is.
- This assumption is crucial to the author's argument that grizzly bears are not as dangerous as commonly believed, as the comparison is based solely on the annual fatality rate.

Reasoning Behind the Comparison:
- The author uses the comparison to challenge the perception of grizzly bears as extremely dangerous.
- If the number of fatalities per year was not seen as a valid indicator of danger, the comparison would not be relevant or persuasive.
- Therefore, the assumption that the number of deaths per year accurately reflects the level of danger is necessary for the author's argument to hold weight.

Conclusion:
- The author relies on the assumption that the number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something's dangerousness in order to make the case that grizzly bears are not as dangerous as commonly believed.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by g...
A. Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal. This option suggests that the majority of incidents involving grizzly bears result in fatalities. However, the passage does not provide information or make claims about the fatality rate of incidents involving grizzly bears. Therefore, this option is not the assumption the author relies upon.
B. Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were. This option implies that grizzly bears are less dangerous now compared to the past. However, the passage does not discuss any changes in the danger level of grizzly bears over time. Therefore, this option is not the assumption the author relies upon.
C. The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something's dangerousness. This option aligns with the argument made in the passage. The passage compares the number of fatalities caused by different entities (grizzly bears, lightning on golf courses, and electric blenders) to suggest that they are all similarly dangerous. This comparison relies on the assumption that the number of fatalities per year is a suitable indicator of something's dangerousness. If this assumption were false, and the number of fatalities alone was not sufficient to determine dangerousness, it would weaken the argument's conclusion. Therefore, this is the assumption the author relies upon.
D. A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm. This option focuses on the danger of being on a golf course during a thunderstorm. However, the passage does not directly address the danger level of golf courses during thunderstorms or make any specific claims about the danger of being on a golf course in such conditions. Therefore, this option is not the assumption the author relies upon.
E. Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases. This option suggests that something can be considered dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases. The passage does not explicitly state or imply this condition for determining dangerousness. Instead, it compares the number of fatalities caused by different entities to argue for their similar levels of danger. Therefore, this option is not the assumption the author relies upon.
In summary, option C is the assumption the author relies upon, which is that the number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something's dangerousness.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Most research on the subject has assumed that users of new technologies learn about and modify new technologies gradually. This assumption underlies the concept of the learning curve, a familiar model which presumes that learners gain knowledge in a continuous and highly regular progression over time.However, when a new technology is introduced into a particular sector of a company, the process of learning about and modifying that technology may not, in fact, be continuous. In general, the introduction of new technology into ongoing operations triggers an initial burst of learning or adaptive activity as users explore the technology and attempt to resolve unexpected problems. Such intense activity is often short-lived, however, with users effort and attention declining dramatically after the first few months. This rapid decline tends to occur even when serious problems remain unresolved, a trend which suggests that the dramatic falloff in learning or adaptive activity shortly after new technology is introduced does not reflect users having mastered the new technology. The period of intense activity by users is typically followed by one in which users return their attention to their customary production tasks, though using the new technology to accomplish those tasks. Later on, particularly when challenges related to the new technology arise, users often turn their attention back to the new technology, initiating additional spurts of learning or adaptive activity. In many cases, this pattern continues over time, with brief periods of learning or adaptation followed by longer periods of relatively routine use.Understanding that the pattern of user learning and adaptation is discontinuous can yield important benefits. Managers who anticipate and plan for intense user activity when a new technology is first introduced are better able to exploit the surge of energy and user motivation that usually occurs at the start of a project when improvements are easiest to implement, and major problems are most obvious. Moreover, by attempting to confine major modifications to start- up periods, such managers can better realize the benefits of periods of routine usage of the technology, during which productivity typically begins to increase and the effectiveness of previous modifications can be assessed.The author of the passage most likely mentions "the learning curve" in the highlighted text for which of the following reasons?

Most research on the subject has assumed that users of new technologies learn about and modify new technologies gradually. This assumption underlies the concept of the learning curve, a familiar model which presumes that learners gain knowledge in a continuous and highly regular progression over time.However, when a new technology is introduced into a particular sector of a company, the process of learning about and modifying that technology may not, in fact, be continuous. In general, the introduction of new technology into ongoing operations triggers an initial burst of learning or adaptive activity as users explore the technology and attempt to resolve unexpected problems. Such intense activity is often short-lived, however, with users effort and attention declining dramatically after the first few months. This rapid decline tends to occur even when serious problems remain unresolved, a trend which suggests that the dramatic falloff in learning or adaptive activity shortly after new technology is introduced does not reflect users having mastered the new technology. The period of intense activity by users is typically followed by one in which users return their attention to their customary production tasks, though using the new technology to accomplish those tasks. Later on, particularly when challenges related to the new technology arise, users often turn their attention back to the new technology, initiating additional spurts of learning or adaptive activity. In many cases, this pattern continues over time, with brief periods of learning or adaptation followed by longer periods of relatively routine use.Understanding that the pattern of user learning and adaptation is discontinuous can yield important benefits. Managers who anticipate and plan for intense user activity when a new technology is first introduced are better able to exploit the surge of energy and user motivation that usually occurs at the start of a project when improvements are easiest to implement, and major problems are most obvious. Moreover, by attempting to confine major modifications to start- up periods, such managers can better realize the benefits of periods of routine usage of the technology, during which productivity typically begins to increase and the effectiveness of previous modifications can be assessed.According to information contained in the passage, the author would be most likely to describe the process by which users learn about and adapt to new technology as

Scholars studying diversity in students pursuing higher education stress the need for diversity among the faculty and staff of institutions offering such education. It is seen as a way of creating a more welcoming and supportive environment for minorities and of enhancing education for all students. Accordingly, they argue that hiring more Native American faculty and staff is a potential way to help others in the university to become more aware of and responsive to the challenges faced by some Native American students, thereby leading to more effective and culturally competent programs. However, this argument ignores a crucial ground reality. Even though many proponents of the idea discuss variations in cultural orientations among indigenous people, there seems to be an assumption that Native American professors and students share common values and hence teachers of Native American ethnicity are thought to have more insight than their counterparts from other ethnicities into Native American students. But the reality is that Native Americans form an extremely heterogeneous population. Students and teachers of Native American origin can differ in a variety of ways, such as tribal background and level of connection to their culture, and therefore making blanket assumptions about the cultural identity of Native American people who become faculty is just as inappropriate as it is to make stereotypical assumptions about Native American people in general. Accordingly, before any key changes are implemented, it would be reasonable to probe how Native American people who have achieved an extensive background in higher education differ culturally from their tribal communities of origin.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?

Most research on the subject has assumed that users of new technologies learn about and modify new technologies gradually. This assumption underlies the concept of the learning curve, a familiar model which presumes that learners gain knowledge in a continuous and highly regular progression over time.However, when a new technology is introduced into a particular sector of a company, the process of learning about and modifying that technology may not, in fact, be continuous. In general, the introduction of new technology into ongoing operations triggers an initial burst of learning or adaptive activity as users explore the technology and attempt to resolve unexpected problems. Such intense activity is often short-lived, however, with users effort and attention declining dramatically after the first few months. This rapid decline tends to occur even when serious problems remain unresolved, a trend which suggests that the dramatic falloff in learning or adaptive activity shortly after new technology is introduced does not reflect users having mastered the new technology. The period of intense activity by users is typically followed by one in which users return their attention to their customary production tasks, though using the new technology to accomplish those tasks. Later on, particularly when challenges related to the new technology arise, users often turn their attention back to the new technology, initiating additional spurts of learning or adaptive activity. In many cases, this pattern continues over time, with brief periods of learning or adaptation followed by longer periods of relatively routine use.Understanding that the pattern of user learning and adaptation is discontinuous can yield important benefits. Managers who anticipate and plan for intense user activity when a new technology is first introduced are better able to exploit the surge of energy and user motivation that usually occurs at the start of a project when improvements are easiest to implement, and major problems are most obvious. Moreover, by attempting to confine major modifications to start- up periods, such managers can better realize the benefits of periods of routine usage of the technology, during which productivity typically begins to increase and the effectiveness of previous modifications can be assessed.The passage is primarily concerned with

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?a)Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.b)Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.c)The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.d)A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.e)Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup