Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the authorandrsquo;s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Contrary to the charges made by some of its o...

Join the Discussion on the App

The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out that

a)
the expertise of those opposing the law is outstanding
b)
the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoral
c)
the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cuts
d)
economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present law
e)
the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions ...

The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author's strategy by pointing out that the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so. This is reflected in option E.

The author's argument is based on the example of the New Deal, which pulled the country out of economic troubles despite some of its programs being later found unconstitutional. However, the opponents could argue that just because certain flawed programs or laws have had a positive impact on the economy in the past, it does not guarantee that every similar program will have the same effect. They could question the generalization made by the author and argue that the new deficit-reduction law may not be justified, even if the New Deal was successful in some aspects.

Therefore, the correct answer is E. the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so.

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all GMAT courses

Most Upvoted Answer

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions ...

Therefore, the correct answer is E. the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Community Answer

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions ...

Understanding the Argument
The author asserts that the new deficit-reduction law, which some opponents criticize for its potential to enforce indiscriminate budget cuts, is justified. They draw a parallel to the New Deal, arguing that it successfully addressed severe economic issues despite certain programs being deemed unconstitutional.
Counterargument: Flawed Programs and Economic Improvement
Opponents can effectively challenge the author’s claim by pointing out that:
- The fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so.
- This highlights a critical flaw in the author’s reasoning. Just because the New Deal had some successful components does not guarantee that the current law will yield similar results.
- Each economic context is unique, and the specific conditions that enabled the New Deal's success may not be replicated today.
Importance of Unique Contexts
- Every economic policy must be evaluated on its own merits.
- The New Deal was a response to the Great Depression, a unique economic crisis, and its outcomes cannot be directly compared to contemporary legislation.
- Economic circumstances, societal values, and government capabilities have evolved, requiring a fresh analysis of current policies.
Conclusion
In summary, while the New Deal provided valuable lessons, the assertion that its success justifies the current law overlooks the complexity and uniqueness of economic situations. Opponents can leverage this understanding to argue that past successes do not guarantee future outcomes, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of the new law's implications.

Share via Whatsapp

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Shortly after September 11, 2001, the United States began requesting additional financial information about persons of interest by subpoenaing records located at the SWIFT banking consortium. SWIFT, which routes trillions of dollars a day, faced an ethical dilemma: fight the subpoenas in order to protect member privacy and the groups reputation for the highest level of confidentiality, or, comply and provide information about thousands of financial communications in the hope that lives will be saved. SWIFT decided to comply in secret, but in late June 2006, four major U.S. newspapers disclosed SWIFTs compliance. This sparked a heated public debate over the ethics of SWIFTs decision to reveal ostensibly confidential financial communications.Analyzing the situation in hindsight, three ethical justifications existed for not complying with the Treasury Departments requests. First, SWIFT needed to uphold its long-standing values of confidentiality, non-disclosure, and institutional trust. The second ethical reason against SWIFTs involvement came with inadequate government oversight as the Treasury Department failed to construct necessary safeguards to ensure the privacy of the data. Third, international law must be upheld and one could argue quite strongly that the governments use of data breached some parts of international law.Although SWIFT executives undoubtedly considered the aforementioned reasons for rejecting the governments subpoena, three ethical justifications for complying existed. First, it could be argued that the program was legal because the United States government possesses the authority to subpoena records stored within its territory and SWIFT maintained many of its records in Virginia. Second, it is entirely possible that complying with the governments subpoena thwarted another catastrophic terrorist attack that would have cost lives and dollars. Third, cooperating with the government did not explicitly violate any SWIFT policies due to the presence of a valid subpoena. However, the extent of cooperation certainly surprised many financial institutions and sparked some outrage and debate within the financial community.While SWIFT had compelling arguments both for agreeing and refusing to cooperate with the U.S. government program, even in hindsight, it is impossible to judge with certitude the wisdom and ethics of SWIFTs decision to cooperate as we still lack answers to important questions such as: what information did the government want? What promises did the government make about data confidentially? What, if any, potentially impending threats did the government present to justify its need for data?Q.Inferring from the passage, which of the following constituted an ethical justification for SWIFT complying with the government?

View answer

Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely endorse which of the following proposals?

View answer

Origami is capable of turning a simple sheet of paper into a pretty paper crane, but the principles behind the paper-folding art can also be applied to making a microfluidic device for a blood test, or for storing a satellites solar panel in a rockets cargo bay. A team of researchers is turning kirigami, a related art form that allows the paper to be cut, into a technique that can be applied equally to structures on those vastly divergent length scales. The researchers lay out the rules for folding and cutting a hexagonal lattice, a structure made from strips of material that cross over each other with spaces between, into a wide variety of useful three-dimensional shapes.A hexagonal lattice may seem like an odd choice for a starting point, but the researchers think that the pattern has advantages over a seemingly simpler tessellation, such as one made from squares; for instance, it is easier to fill a space with a hexagonal lattice and move from 2-D to 3-D. Starting from a flat hexagonal grid on a sheet of paper, the researchers outlined the fundamental cuts and folds that allow the resulting shape to keep the same proportions of the initial lattice, even if some of the material is removed. This is a critical quality for making the transition from paper to materials that might be used in real-world applications.Having a set of rules that draws on fundamental mathematical principles means that the kirigami approach can be applied equally across length scales, and with almost any material that can be selected on the basis of its relevance to the ultimate application, whether it is in nanotechnology, architecture, or aerospace.The rules also guarantee that modules, basic shapes such as channels that can direct the flow of fluids, can be combined into more complex ones. Kirigami is particularly attractive for nanoscale applications, where the simplest, most space-efficient shapes are necessary, and self-folding materials would circumvent some of the fabrication challenges inherent in working with other materials at such small scales.Which of the following most aptly describes the function of the second paragraph?

View answer

Which of the following best completes the passage below?An Entertainment industry spokespersons statement that the industry loses millions of dollars every year due to illegal downloads of mobile applications. Yet, this claim is not representative of the truth. Most people who illegally download mobile applications without paying for them are those that have no serious interest in that application. Thus, the loss to the industry is quite small, because......

View answer

Principle: If you sell an item that you know to be defective, telling the buyer that the item is sound, you thereby commit fraud.Application: Wilton sold a used bicycle to Harris, knowing very little about its condition. Wilton told Harris that the bicycle was in good working condition, but Harris soon learned that the brakes were defective. Wilton was therefore guilty of fraud.The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out thata)the expertise of those opposing the law is outstandingb)the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoralc)the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cutsd)economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present lawe)the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do soCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam