Question Description
Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.b)The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusionc)The first is a finding whose possible implication is at issue in the argument; the second is an explanation presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that funding.d)The first is an evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.e)The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.