GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Manager: the new manufacturing process should... Start Learning for Free
Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.
Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?
  • a)
    Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing process
  • b)
    Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be corrected
  • c)
    Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown out
  • d)
    Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processes
  • e)
    Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, ev...
Let's go through each answer choice and see which one is the most useful for evaluating the claim:
(A) Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing process.
This answer choice is not directly relevant to evaluating the claim. While training requirements may be important for implementing the new process, they do not provide information about the claim's validity.
(B) Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be corrected.
This answer choice is the most relevant for evaluating the claim. If the new process introduces deficiencies or imperfections, it could negate the benefits claimed in the argument. For example, if the new process results in a higher rate of defective components that need to be corrected, the time savings from eliminating two steps may be offset by the need for additional corrective actions.
(C) Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown out.
This answer choice is partially relevant, as it addresses the handling of defective components. However, it does not directly address the claim about time savings and the elimination of steps in the manufacturing process.
(D) Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processes.
This answer choice introduces a new factor (a third manufacturing process) that is not discussed in the argument. It is not directly relevant to evaluating the claim about the time savings and elimination of steps in the existing manufacturing process.
(E) Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.
While cost savings may be important for the company, this answer choice does not directly address the claim about time savings and the elimination of steps in the manufacturing process.
Therefore, the most useful answer choice for evaluating the claim made in the argument is (B). Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be corrected. This choice directly addresses the potential drawbacks of the new process, which could affect the overall time savings and the elimination of steps in the manufacturing process.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time overall, even though the first step of the five-step process will take twice as long as it does under the old process. Under the new process, far fewer of the components will be found defective, and the sole purpose of steps two and three under the old process is to weed out defective components. As a result, we should be able to eliminate two of the five steps in the existing manufacturing process.Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?a)Whether factory workers will require training in order to use the new manufacturing processb)Whether the new process is likely to introduce deficiencies or imperfections that must be correctedc)Whether defective components can be fixed or must be thrown outd)Whether a third manufacturing process would save even more time than both the old and new manufacturing processese)Whether saving time with the new manufacturing process will ultimately lead to cost savings for the company.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev