All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GRE Exam  >  GRE Questions  >   Directions: Answer the question based on the... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.
While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes that
the Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in the
workforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturing
jobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries where
women were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with the
war. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of male
farmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.
Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, even
though rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.
Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agricultural
sectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which of
the following respects?
  • a)
    The rate of expansion in each sector
  • b)
    The percentage of employees in each sector who were men
  • c)
    The trend in the wages of men employed in each sector
  • d)
    The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sector
  • e)
    The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passag...
Explanation:

Percentage of employees in each sector who were men:
- The passage states that in the manufacturing sector, few women remained in jobs once men returned from the war, indicating that the majority of employees in this sector were men.
- On the other hand, in the agriculture sector, the number of male farmworkers decreased, leading to an increase in the hiring of women post-war.
Therefore, the manufacturing and agriculture sectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in the percentage of employees who were men.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passag...
The correct choice for this question is Choice B. We are told that few women remained in the manufacturing sector once men returned from the war, while the number of women who worked in agriculture increased after the war as the number of men in agriculture decreased. It is, therefore, inferable that the percentage of employees working in manufacturing who were men increased while the percentage of employees working in agriculture who were men decreased. Choices A, C, and E are incorrect because the passage provides no information about rates of expansion, wage trends, or women’s job satisfaction. Choice D is incorrect because the only mention of the popular media occurs in the final sentence, and no distinction is made between the sectors there.
Attention GRE Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GRE study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GRE.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GRE exam

Similar GRE Doubts

Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. Which of the following statements about women’s employment in the UnitedStates during and after the Second World War is most clearly supported by thepassage?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Since the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, societies have wrestled with the question of how to balance the benefits of new technologies with the loss of employment these changes may engender. In our own time, not only have jobs in manufacturing disappeared with the expanding implementation of robotics but also professional careers are now threatened by social media. While many people believe that those enjoying lofty levels of compensation resist redistribution of wealth, a recent book by social media multimillionaire Chris Hughes argues for a guaranteed minimum income, funded primarily by a marginal tax rate of 50 percent on individual annual incomes over $250,000, to offset reduced employment due to technological advances.Reflecting on his own fortuitous life story, Hughes recounts how his chance selection of Mark Zuckerberg as his roommate in college was the primary determinant of Hughes’s own success. Zuckerberg recruited Hughes and a few other friends to help with his side project, Facebook, and within a few years, Hughes’s ownership share was worth an inconceivable amount of money. Hughes recognizes that his meteoric rise from the middle class was a product not only of hiseducation and effort but also of luck. In addition, Hughes believes that opportunities for upward economic mobility are becoming less accessible as developments in technology supplant employment opportunities. Social media, Hughess own vehicle for success, for example, may reduce the number of salespeople or human resource recruiters employed because social media algorithms can connect people to products or to other people more efficiently than can a human intermediary.While Hughes may be commended for his ethos of generosity and his recognition of an impending social dilemma, his solution suffers the same failings as those offered by other technology moguls. There is no consideration of the formidable political obstacles to his plan or how these obstacles could be overcome.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author would likely agree with which of the following proposals for change to the economic system?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.Since the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, societies have wrestled with the question of how to balance the benefits of new technologies with the loss of employment these changes may engender. In our own time, not only have jobs in manufacturing disappeared with the expanding implementation of robotics but also professional careers are now threatened by social media. While many people believe that those enjoying lofty levels of compensation resist redistribution of wealth, a recent book by social media multimillionaire Chris Hughes argues for a guaranteed minimum income, funded primarily by a marginal tax rate of 50 percent on individual annual incomes over $250,000, to offset reduced employment due to technological advances.Reflecting on his own fortuitous life story, Hughes recounts how his chance selection of Mark Zuckerberg as his roommate in college was the primary determinant of Hughes’s own success. Zuckerberg recruited Hughes and a few other friends to help with his side project, Facebook, and within a few years, Hughes’s ownership share was worth an inconceivable amount of money. Hughes recognizes that his meteoric rise from the middle class was a product not only of hiseducation and effort but also of luck. In addition, Hughes believes that opportunities for upward economic mobility are becoming less accessible as developments in technology supplant employment opportunities. Social media, Hughess own vehicle for success, for example, may reduce the number of salespeople or human resource recruiters employed because social media algorithms can connect people to products or to other people more efficiently than can a human intermediary.While Hughes may be commended for his ethos of generosity and his recognition of an impending social dilemma, his solution suffers the same failings as those offered by other technology moguls. There is no consideration of the formidable political obstacles to his plan or how these obstacles could be overcome.Q.Which of the following best describes the function of the second sentence in the second paragraph ("Zuckerberg recruited . . . money") in the context of the passage as a whole?

PASSAGE:Most economists in the United states seem captivated by spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good ornormal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market.A price that is determined by the seller or for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious, Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price – fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that requires, Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-markets economic theories. But each large firms will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price cutting, because price cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.More over those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non socialist countries other than the United States. These economies employ intentional price-fixing usually in an overt fashion. Formal price fixing by cartel and informal price fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are common place. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.Socialist industry also works within a frame work of controlled prices. In early 1970’s, the soviet union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market.But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by free market over which they exercise little influenced than are capitalist firms.Q.According to the author, priced-fixing in nonsocialist countries is often.

PASSAGE:Most economists in the United states seem captivated by spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good ornormal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market.A price that is determined by the seller or for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious, Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price – fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that requires, Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-markets economic theories. But each large firms will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price cutting, because price cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.More over those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non socialist countries other than the United States. These economies employ intentional price-fixing usually in an overt fashion. Formal price fixing by cartel and informal price fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are common place. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.Socialist industry also works within a frame work of controlled prices. In early 1970’s, the soviet union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market.But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by free market over which they exercise little influenced than are capitalist firms.Q. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

Top Courses for GREView all

Top Courses for GRE

Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GRE 2024 is part of GRE preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GRE exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GRE 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GRE. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GRE Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Answer the question based on the following reading passage.While most scholarship on women’s employment in the United States recognizes thatthe Second World War (1939–1945) dramatically changed the role of women in theworkforce, these studies also acknowledge that few women remained in manufacturingjobs once men returned from the war. But in agriculture, unlike other industries wherewomen were viewed as temporary workers, women’s employment did not end with thewar. Instead, the expansion of agriculture and a steady decrease in the number of malefarmworkers combined to cause the industry to hire more women in the postwar years.Consequently, the 1950s saw a growing number of women engaged in farm labor, eventhough rhetoric in the popular media called for the return of women to domestic life.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturing and agriculturalsectors in the United States following the Second World War differed in which ofthe following respects?a)The rate of expansion in each sectorb)The percentage of employees in each sector who were menc)The trend in the wages of men employed in each sectord)The attitude of the popular media toward the employment of women in each sectore)The extent to which women in each sector were satisfied with their jobsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GRE tests.
Explore Courses for GRE exam

Top Courses for GRE

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup