GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Letter to the editor: Middle-class families i... Start Learning for Free
Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.
The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that it
  • a)
    criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itself
  • b)
    takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is held
  • c)
    presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do so
  • d)
    fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusion
  • e)
    generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a few
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are oft...
The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that it (A) criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itself.
The letter to the editor dismisses the criticism of middle-class families based on the perceived hypocrisy of movie stars or celebrities who criticize them. Instead of addressing the actual argument presented by the movie stars or celebrities, the letter focuses on their lifestyles. This is a form of ad hominem fallacy, which attacks the character or personal traits of an individual instead of addressing the merits of their argument. The letter fails to engage with the substance of the criticism and instead criticizes the source itself. Therefore, option (A) is the correct choice.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Letter to the editor: Middle-class families in wealthy nations are often criticized for the ecological damage resulting from their lifestyles. This criticism should not be taken too seriously, however, since its source is often a movie star or celebrity whose own lifestyle would, if widely adopted, destroy the environment and deplete our resources in a short time.The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that ita)criticizes a characteristic of the people giving an argument rather than criticizing the argument itselfb)takes failure to act consistently with a belief as an indication of the sincerity with which that belief is heldc)presumes that a viewpoint must be unreasonable to accept simply because some of the grounds advanced to support it do not adequately do sod)fails to recognize that evidence advanced in support of a conclusion actually undermines that conclusione)generalizes about the behavior of all people on the basis of the behavior of a fewCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev